[tdsoc] Re: vote for the license
- From: Cristian-Alexandru Staicu <cris.staicu@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tdsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 11:39:35 +0100
I also vote for LGPL for kind of the same reason: you can get a lot of
useful contributions from the people that uses your software and modify it
for their needs - I think this is the minimum price that someone should
"pay" for using a free library.
Cristian
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Alessio Parzian <parzio90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As explained in my last email I support lgpl license.
>
> Alessio
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Massimiliano Sala
> <maxsalacodes@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> I vote for lpgl, because I'd like that people modifying our software are
>> forced to declare the modifications they made.
>>
>> max
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Andrea Nodari
>> <andrea.nodari91@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> > i vote for apache2, because it can be used in a more flexible way in a
>>> > business environment.
>>>
>>> I vote for apache2 for the same reasons
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/3/7 Lorenzo Nicolodi <lorenzo.nicolodi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>> i vote for apache2, because it can be used in a more flexible way in a
>>>> business environment.
>>>>
>>>> see ya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lorenzo Nicolodi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrea Nodari
>>>
>>> Twitter: @andrenodari
>>> Website: nodo.github.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Massimiliano Sala
>>
>> Universita' di Trento
>> Direttore Laboratorio di Matematica Industriale e Crittografia
>> Responsabile degli stage del Dipartimento di Matematica
>>
>> tel: 0461-282055
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "We must combine the toughness of the serpent and the softness of the
> dove, a tough mind and a tender heart.”
>
Other related posts:
