A point of information - in relation to far-side signals on Puffins and black-out periods (without commenting on the desirability of either). I understand that there is no technical problem with the use of black-outs on Puffins. TAL 1/02 allows/recommends their use on near-side indicators on refuge islands within Puffin crossings over wide carriageways (although admittedly few authorities want to design signalled crossings with refuges these days). We enquired a little while ago about this type of arrangement for a scheme that may have required this facility. It appears that several authorities have installed this type of arrangement (with a black-out only on indicators in the central refuge) - and at least some manufacturers have advised me how they have implemented this in practice on their signal controllers. So we really get back to if we (and DfT/HA) want to use black-out periods and far-side signals on Puffins. Implementation is not a major issue. For those interested in the implementation policies for pedestrian crossing timings (including red-man and black-out periods) in various cities around the UK (on standard ped. signals), Leeds City Council (MH) produced a report on this (for the Core Cities group?) in December 1999 which some may find interesting. Regards Howard Saffer Sheffield City Council The information in this email is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please tell us by using the reply facility in your email software as soon as possible. Sheffield City Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended please tell us as soon as possible. ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug