[taos-glug] Re: thumbs down to SICP Exercise 2.32; empty sets, append
- From: John McDermott <jjm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: taos-glug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:55:34 -0600
> Also, is it correct that the empty set is a subset of itself?
Set theory was a long time ago, but one thing I remember is that every
set has itself and the empty set as subsets of itself. In the case of
the empty set these two are the same set (the empty set itself).
--john
--
John McDermott
Writer, Educator, Consultant
jjm@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.jkintl.com
V +1 505/377-6293 F +1 505/377-6313
Other related posts:
