[studiorecorder] Re: Access Ideas Needed

  • From: "Neal Ewers" <neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:24:20 -0500

Jamie, that would be my second choice.  It seems much better than option
two which is not very Windows standard.  I could live with either option
1 or 3 without any trouble at all.  And thanks to rob for allowing us to
help decide.  .

Neal



-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamie Pauls
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:17 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Access Ideas Needed


I personally like option three, even though some people might not like
the gymnastics required to execute all the key strokes. I guess there's
a downside to everything. (smile) 

-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ROB MEREDITH
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:26 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Access Ideas Needed

We are considering adding a few more features to be spoken through JAWS
or Window-eyes. Since the peak hold was a big hit, we are thinking that
direct access to specific status bar items might be of use. The question
is, how do we present this information?

Imagine that you want to know the following things frequently: 1. The
current position in time 2. The length of the document in time 3. Free
space on the hard drive

Of course you could arrange the status bar to show only these three
items, and use your screen reader's command to read the status bar. We
could also add a Read Status Bar command. But, what if you just wanted
to hear one of the items, and quickly?

Here are three ways we have considered. Feel free to express your views,
or even suggest an entirely different way:

Option 1. Use a single key for speaking preferred information. When
pressed once, the most preferable information would be spoken. When
pressed twice quickly, the next most preferable information would be
spoken. Finally, pressing the key three times quickly would speak your
number three preference. This is very JAWS-like.
Problems:
1. A dialog would be needed to specify what should be spoken, and in
what order. 2. Only three functions would be available, since pressing a
key four times quickly would be annoying at least. Pressing a key three
times is already pushing the limit.

Option 2. Use a single key followed by a letter key which specifies what
is to be spoken. For example, you would press a certain key, then T for
total time, C for current time, or F for free hard drive space.
Problems:
1. Very non-Windows like, since program would be in a "mode."

Option 3. Just use key combinations, such as Ctrl+Shift+F1 for current
time,
Ctrl+Shift+F2 for total time, and so on.
Problems:
1. We could run out of keys quickly, since many keys are already in use.
2. Using a lot of modifiers would annoy some people, for example,
Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F5.

Ok, have your say!

Rob Meredith








Other related posts: