Hello. Just a short note from Norway congratulating You on Your success in implementing the START. It is obvious from Your mail that You have done the right things in employing allready existing knowledge and knowhow to set up START as an organizing principle for Your risk and rehabilitation assessment planning, if I understand You correctly. The smoothness problems in the civil side is a well known difficulty, as we too have seen, in that civil psychiatry usually is not that used to do structured crossdisciplinary assessments, so it represents the challenge of providing some elementary groundwork that we some times does not have to do in the security/forensic branch. The importance of advocacy and outreach in laying the groundwork for structured implementation cannot be overstated, as the peer to peer discussions this approach engenders is, in my experience, of decissive importance in removing some of the major stumbling blocks in any implementation process (for instance the "oh no, not another scheme"-obstacle, or the "so this is the newfangled idea of the high and mighty"-obstacle). This is what I have talked about earlier as the "sidling up to people and wanting to show them something very interesting"-approach, or the "insidious" way of doing implementation. We use START monthly (approx) in our (very small, but hey, Norway is a small country) security hospital, and it lays the groundwork for any important change in security level and leads the therapeutic work on the wards an OC therapy. We have implemented the START in a section of our local prisons, which have posed some challenges in that this represents a meeting between two cultures (prison and hospital) with different training and professional definitions/identity. Using the START as an aide in developing better interinstitutional understanding seems promising, but we have to og further along in the process to see if there are real benefits to this work. It makes supervision to the prison a lot easier in the least. We are also working with on of our civil long term closed wards and another security hospital. Implementation is a never ending process, and one of the reasons the START is still in use at our place 5-6 years after I first got introduced to it, is that a core group of people never have stopped taking an interest ans have kept on talking about, asking for and doing the START. Good luck on Your work, and keep us posted. Best Regards Kåre Nonstad Senior Psychologist Broset Regional Security Hospital and Research Facility Trondheim, Norway. -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] På vegne av Alexander M MILLKEY Sendt: 6. juli 2009 16:38 Til: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Kopi: Brooke HOWARD; Darci WALKER; Elena BALDUZZI; Nat B THOMAS; Steven J WILSON Emne: [startgroup] Re: E-mail list Hello All, I'm very glad that you have set up this listserv - thank you very much! It will be helpful to be able to confer with colleagues. I am curious to hear how the START is being used at other insitutions, and generally the implementation went. We have received advice from Tonia, Johann, Marcel, and Sarah about implementation, and have read the articles that have been published, but I think that we at my hospital could benefit from the experience of others. At Oregon State Hospital (OSH) - a state-run forensic and long-term civil hospital with a census of about 650 - we began using the START eight or nine months ago as a central feature for our hospital board that makes decisions about granting privileges and recommending conditional release (the Risk Review Panel). I think that within a month we will begin having our treatment teams administer the START every three months (or more frequently), and I think it will be integrated into treatment planning. Implementation has gone relatively well. Forensic units adopted it fairly readily. I think that this is because the Risk Review Panel meets with foensic treatment teams regularly and can provide feedback, and also because risk assessment is a familiar and accepted part of the forensic culture at OSH. Implementation has been less smooth with the civil side of the hospital, but is moving along (I think primarily due to the advocacy and outreach of a couple of members of our START Implementation Team). There seems to be some internal debate as to whether the START should implemented on our Civil Geriatric wards. How is the START being used elsewhere, and how has implementation been? Best Regards, Alex Alexander M. Millkey, Psy.D. Evaluation Psychologist Forensic Evaluation Service Oregon State Hospital Office: (503) 945-9262 Fax: (503) 945-9747 Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended solely for the entity or individual to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying , or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this e-mail, including any attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. If you are not the intended addressee, you should contact the sender immediately and delete this message. Thank you. >>> "Roger Almvik" <roger.almvik@xxxxxxx> 07/06/09 1:39 AM >>> Hi all ! This is the email list for clinicians and researchers related to the use of and research related to the START . All emails sent to this email address will be distributed to the rest of the group. Save this email address (startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) in your contacts and every time you want to send an email to all group members just use this address. Please note that you can only use this list from the address you are registered with. If you like to add more email addresses, please let me know and we will add it to the list. If any problems or questions, please contact me at roger.almvik@xxxxxxx Cheers -- Research Director Roger Almvik, DPhil, RN, RMN St. Olav's Hospital, Forensic Dept. Bröset Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry Norwegian University of Science & Technology,INM, NTNU PO 1803 Lade, N-7440 Trondheim, Norway. Tel +47 45468880 PS Sarah, the list is more or less complete now From: startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Desmarais, Sarah Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 10:09 PM To: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [startgroup] Re: E-mail list Hi all, Roger - thanks for setting this up! You probably have most of these already, but here is a list of START contacts that I've built up over the years. I'm missing some of the contacts from your group as well as Anne's (and probably some others), but I'm sure someone can forward you those addresses. It was so nice to those of you who were at the Edinburgh meeting. As promised I will send around version 1.1 shortly. It will probably be easiest to send to everyone using this new account. Roger, can you please let me know when the list is more or less finalized? Looking forward to working with everyone. Best wishes, Sarah