[startgroup] SV: Re: E-mail list

  • From: <Kare.Nonstad@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:44:53 +0200

Hello. Just a short note from Norway congratulating You on Your success in 
implementing the START. It is obvious from Your mail that You have done the 
right things in employing allready existing knowledge and knowhow to set up 
START as an organizing principle for Your risk and rehabilitation assessment 
planning, if I understand You correctly. The smoothness problems in the civil 
side is a well known difficulty, as we too have seen, in that civil psychiatry 
usually is not that used to do structured crossdisciplinary assessments, so it 
represents the challenge of providing some elementary groundwork that we some 
times does not have to do in the security/forensic branch. The importance of 
advocacy and outreach in laying the groundwork for structured implementation 
cannot be overstated, as the peer to peer discussions this approach engenders 
is, in my experience, of decissive importance in removing some of the major 
stumbling blocks in any implementation process (for instance the "oh no, not 
another scheme"-obstacle, or the "so this is the newfangled idea of the high 
and mighty"-obstacle). This is what I have talked about earlier as the "sidling 
up to people and wanting to show them something very interesting"-approach, or 
the "insidious" way of doing implementation. We use START monthly (approx) in 
our (very small, but hey, Norway is a small country) security hospital, and it 
lays the groundwork for any important change in security level and leads the 
therapeutic work on the wards an OC therapy. We have implemented the START in a 
section of our local prisons, which have posed some challenges in that this 
represents a meeting between two cultures (prison and hospital) with different 
training and professional definitions/identity. Using the START as an aide in 
developing better interinstitutional understanding seems promising, but we have 
to og further along in the process to see if there are real benefits to this 
work. It makes supervision to the prison a lot easier in the least. We are also 
working with on of our civil long term closed wards and another security 
hospital. Implementation is a never ending process, and one of the reasons the 
START is still in use at our place 5-6 years after I first got introduced to 
it, is that a core group of people never have stopped taking an interest ans 
have kept on talking about, asking for and doing the START.
Good luck on Your work, and keep us posted.
Best Regards
Kåre Nonstad
Senior Psychologist
Broset Regional Security Hospital and Research Facility
Trondheim, Norway.  

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
På vegne av Alexander M MILLKEY
Sendt: 6. juli 2009 16:38
Til: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kopi: Brooke HOWARD; Darci WALKER; Elena BALDUZZI; Nat B THOMAS; Steven J WILSON
Emne: [startgroup] Re: E-mail list

Hello All,

I'm very glad that you have set up this listserv - thank you very much! It will 
be helpful to be able to confer with colleagues. 

I am curious to hear how the START is being used at other insitutions, and 
generally the implementation went. We have received advice from Tonia, Johann, 
Marcel, and Sarah about implementation, and have read the articles that have 
been published, but I think that we at my hospital could benefit from the 
experience of others.

At Oregon State Hospital (OSH) - a state-run forensic and long-term civil 
hospital with a census of about 650 - we began using the START eight or nine 
months ago as a central feature for our hospital board that makes decisions 
about granting privileges and recommending conditional release (the Risk Review 
Panel). I think that within a month we will begin having our treatment teams 
administer the START every three months (or more frequently), and I think it 
will be integrated into treatment planning.

Implementation has gone relatively well. Forensic units adopted it fairly 
readily. I think that this is because the Risk Review Panel meets with foensic 
treatment teams regularly and can provide feedback, and also because risk 
assessment is a familiar and accepted part of the forensic culture at OSH. 
Implementation has been less smooth with the civil side of the hospital, but is 
moving along (I think primarily due to the advocacy and outreach of a couple of 
members of our START Implementation Team). There seems to be some internal 
debate as to whether the START should implemented on our Civil Geriatric wards. 

How is the START being used elsewhere, and how has implementation been?

Best Regards,

Alex

Alexander M. Millkey, Psy.D. 
Evaluation Psychologist
Forensic Evaluation Service
Oregon State Hospital
Office: (503) 945-9262
Fax: (503) 945-9747


Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended solely for the entity or 
individual to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying , or 
distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this e-mail, 
including any attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. If you 
are not the intended addressee, you should contact the sender immediately and 
delete this message. Thank you.
>>> "Roger Almvik" <roger.almvik@xxxxxxx> 07/06/09 1:39 AM >>>
Hi all ! This is the email list for clinicians and researchers related to the 
use of and research related to the START . All emails sent to this email 
address will be distributed to the rest of the group. Save this email address 
(startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) in your contacts and every time you want to send an 
email to all group members just use this address. Please note that you can only 
use this list from the address you are registered with. If you like to add more 
email addresses, please let me know and we will add it to the list.

 

If any problems or questions, please contact me at roger.almvik@xxxxxxx

 

Cheers

--
Research Director

Roger Almvik, DPhil, RN, RMN

St. Olav's Hospital, Forensic Dept. Bröset

Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry

Norwegian University of Science & Technology,INM, NTNU

PO 1803 Lade, N-7440 Trondheim, Norway. Tel +47 45468880 

 

 

PS Sarah, the list is more or less complete now

 

From: startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:startgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Desmarais, Sarah
Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 10:09 PM
To: startgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [startgroup] Re: E-mail list

 

Hi all,

Roger - thanks for setting this up! You probably have most of these already, 
but here is a list of START contacts that I've built up over the years. I'm 
missing some of the contacts from your group as well as Anne's (and probably 
some others), but I'm sure someone can forward you those addresses.

 

It was so nice to those of you who were at the Edinburgh meeting. As promised I 
will send around version 1.1 shortly. It will probably be easiest to send to 
everyone using this new account. Roger, can you please let me know when the 
list is more or less finalized? Looking forward to working with everyone.

 

Best wishes,

Sarah

 

 

 





Other related posts:

  • » [startgroup] SV: Re: E-mail list - Kare.Nonstad