[sparkscoffee] Re: Seymour Hersh Succumbs To Disinformation

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 20:11:26 -0400


RR
How about responding to that 1989 Russain report on the concentration victims
you swallowed hook, line and sinker and posted?

Stan the truth seeker


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: Mon, May 11, 2015 8:15 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Seymour Hersh Succumbs To Disinformation



I'm inclined to agree. There are too many things that don't make sense, like
why they got rid of the body after allegedly paying $25 million for it, or why
they would have murdered him in the first place instead of capturing him and
getting information from him. The most logical explanation that fits all of the
known facts is that somebody was murdered but it wasn't Bin Ladin.
-RR

by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Seymour Hersh has published a long account of the homicide of Osama bin Laden:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n10/seymour-m-hersh/the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden

Hersh concludes that the Obama regime’s account of the killing of bin Laden is
a total fabrication except for the fact that bin Laden was killed.

I do not believe Hersh’s story for three reasons. One reason is that bin Laden
was suffering from disease that no one can survive for a decade. His death was
widely reported in 2001. One reason is that even Hersh’s “true” account of
“what really happened” is contradicted by eye witnesses and the initial
Pakistani TV interviews of eye witnesses. One reason is that Hersh’s story is
too convoluted for an assassination raid, a routine event. He exposes lies
within lies, indecision within decision, payoffs within payoffs, and reports
such a huge number of people with advance knowledge of the raid that it cannot
possibly have been kept a secret.

I could add a fourth reason–the US government’s lack of credibility. Washington
lies about everything. For example: Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass
destruction, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Iranian nukes, Russian invasion
of Ukraine. If, as Hersh reports, lies comprise 99% of Washington’s tale of the
raid in Abbottabad, why believe that 1% of the story is true and that bin Laden
was killed. It is difficult to have murder without a body. The only evidence
that bin Laden was killed is the government’s claim.

In my opinion, Washington’s disinformation agencies have finally managed to
deceive Seymour Hersh with a concocted “inside story” that saves Washington’s
claim of having murdered bin Laden by proving that the US government is an
extraordinary liar and violator of law.

Hersh’s story does prove that the US government is a liar, but it does not
prove that a SEAL team murdered Osama bin Laden.





Other related posts: