[sparkscoffee] Re: Putin and war

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:03:29 -0400

RR
Obviously you think Martin Armstrong is a genius? I don't. There are loads  
of self proclaimed
think tanks with all kinds of idiot analysis.
 
Comrade B
 
 
In a message dated 9/10/2014 10:47:21 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

 
Posted on _September 10, 2014_ 
(http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/09/10/putin-war-return-of-mercenaries-the-masquerade/)
  by _Martin Armstrong_ 
(http://armstrongeconomics.com/author/armstrongeconomics/)  

Many people have  written asking about Putin. The pundits are claiming the 
Russian Army is weak  and could not wage war. Russia is actually looking at 
expanding its military  policy re-targeting Europe and the USA as enemies, 
and rewriting protocols for  justification of a defensive first strike with 
nuclear weapons. The greatest  mistake that the West has made so far is to 
judge Russia through their own  eyes based upon themselves with extreme 
arrogance and prejudice. Just because  you would not want war does not mean 
your 
opponent has the same view.  Additionally, the arrogance of the politicians 
can force war by their  unyielding posture and inability to realize that they 
have left their opponent  with no other option.

The arrogance that Russia is weak and could not  afford war is a huge 
mistake because it is the West who cannot afford war in  the middle of an 
economic implosion where we have a Sovereign Debt Crisis  brewing on an 
unprecedented scale. War also gas been an escape valve for  fiscal 
mismanagement and in 
this respect, war become desirable as a decoy to  hide the inability of 
politicians to cope with managing the state.

The  Russian military forces are composed of 150,000 officers and 766,000 
soldiers  on active duty. There are about 2,485,000 reservists. The Russian 
Ground  Forces have 15,500 tanks, 27,607 armored fighting vehicles (AFV), 
5,990  self-propelled guns (SPG), 4,625 towed artillery guns and 3,781 multiple 
 rocket launcher artillery systems (MLRS), according to reports of the 
Military  portal Global Fire Power. For the Air Force, Russia has about 3,082 
airplanes,  jets and helicopters. Russia has only about 114 combat helicopters 
compared to  the USA’s 914 attack helicopters – not counting those bought 
by local civil  police as in Florida.

The Russian Navy has 352 ships and boats.  However, Russia has only one 
aircraft carrier – the Admiral Kuznetsov class.  This was in the service in 
1991. Moscow would like to supplement his holding  by two helicopter carrier 
Mistral class from France.

Moreover, Russia  has over 4,600 nuclear warheads ready for use in their 
collections.  Additionally, Russia has 7,300 nuclear warheads in reserve. 
Furthermore,  Russia has about 330 intercontinental ballistic missiles that 
could be  targeted against the USA domestically. In addition, ten nuclear 
submarines are  equipped with 160 missiles and there are another 576 nuclear  
warheads.

In the next few years, the rocket classes Bulava (SS-N-30)  RS-24 Jars 
(NATO code SS-24) and Iskander-M (SS-26 Stone) are to be built.  Russian 
technology in rocket manufacture is not to be under-estimated. Just in  the 
past 
decades since the Cold War began, Russia has 117 different missile  
technologies that have been used. These systems are partly to extensions of  
older 
technologies. The missile defense system A-135 (NATO code ABM-3) is in  Moscow 
and is ready for use. It protects the capital and the surrounding area  from 
possible attacks. Unlike Iraq or Syria, the USA cannot simply invade with  
impunity. This is not a war that could be won in such a manner and the  
capability of nuclear attacks/defense warn that those levels of warfare are  
off 
the  table.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/09/10/putin-war-return-of-mercenaries-the
-masquerade/

-RR


Other related posts: