RR thanks for the info. Will try that but continue to monitor spam file. JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: DICTATOR ADMINISTRATOR DR HAS GIVEN HIS LAST WA
RNING JUST TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:59:33 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Welcome back. Wondered what happened to you.
When that has happened to me I have the option of indicating the message is not
spam and that seems to fix the problem. Always good to check your spam folder
periodically.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sep 27, 2017 4:25 PM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: DICTATOR ADMINISTRATOR DR HAS GIVEN HIS LAST WA
RNING JUST TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Don't if anyone knows (or cares) but I haven't received any sparks coffee tfc
in months. Found it all backed up in my junk mail file. Any ideas about that?
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: DICTATOR ADMINISTRATOR DR HAS GIVEN HIS LAST
WARNING JUST TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:39:34 -0400
Why should I do extra work for you? You stop sending BCC messages along with
your email to the sparkscoffee list. After you send a message to the group
send a copy of the message to whomever you wish. I'm just concerned with all
this extra work. It's irritating because it's needless. 73 DR
On Sep 27, 2017 14:32, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DRI believe I have a right to share my correspondence to outsiders with the
insiders of the Netand my Bcc list because I think it is of interest and if you
get an error msg because of it why do you have to answer and to whom and who
cares? Just ignore it.
Stan
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>To: Sblumen123@xxxxxxx
<sblumen123@xxxxxxx>
Cc: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Sep 27, 2017 1:16 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: DICTATOR ADMINISTRATOR DR HAS GIVEN HIS LAST
WARNING JUST TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Stan, You still fail to understand. When you send through the
sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a message to another person or list, either using
TO: CC: or BCC: when that person responds the email will post to
sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. This generates two error reports, one to the
sender saying that the sender is not subscribed, the other to the moderators of
the list. ALL I AM ASKING YOU TO DO IS STOP POSTING YOUR MESSAGES THAT YOU
SEND THROUGH SPARKSCOFFEE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx TO OTHERS WHO ARE NOT SUBSCRIBED. Easy,
but you just refuse. How nuts is that? You become a moderator and YOU handle
the garbage your email generates. I'm fine with that, but I am sick of handling
the error messages that your messages generate including the replies from
ChuckisRight which shows you that what RR says is not true. Chuck replied to
the message where he was sent a copy and it goes to sparks coffee. I am so
done with this. Best wishes, DR
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <sblumen123@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry Mr. Dictator this goes on the Net and my Bcc list - HIDDEN SPEECH IS NOT
FREE SPEECH THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS: When anyone of us members posts a msg.
on the Net it only showsour own email address and that of anyone else's if we
included their messages in our post unless wedeleted their email address which
can be done. However it is not our business to require us to removetheir
address, for one thing that person might want feed back plus one of us might
want to respond? It is up to that outsider to complain to the member who
revealed their email address.
DO YOUR WORST.
Stan the gladiator man
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: Sblumen123 <Sblumen123@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Sep 27, 2017 12:35 am
Subject: OFF LIST Stan: A response to limiting FREE SPEECH
Stan, You have been doing this for nearly ten months. Stop it immediately and
stop talking about it. I have reached my limit. All my other messages were off
list to you and Chuck. I never got even one response until Chuck responded with
a "who are you to threaten Stan" message. You will stop sending messages
through this list and you will stop stop talking about it or you are going to
be moderated. This means NOW. You stop talking about this and stop sending non
subscribers messages through this list and everything is OK. This is my LAST
WARNING. Stop it or I will moderate your email to the list. If you get me
angry by non compliance you will be banned from this list. All I want is for
you to stop and stop talking about it. I have no intention of searching for
anything. It will stop NOW. I don't want to deal with error messages
anymore. 73 DR 73 DR
On Sep 26, 2017 15:12, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DRBull shit about warning me for almost 10 months when we are talking about
this just in the last few days, Post proof from almost 10 months ago. Next,
why did you wait almost 10 months to bring it up just now in the last few days?
Is the Net now and always automatically protected from non members posting on
it without you doing anything? Explain what you mean moderating? Answer quick
as I must leave in about 20 minutes or else wait till tomorrow Stan
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Tue, Sep 26, 2017 2:29 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Stan: A response to limiting FREE SPEECH
Stan, If you want to write me off the list about this, fine, but I have already
told you that I am done with this. I have been asking you to stop sending mail
to Chuck for almost ten months. My patience is gone. One more word out of you
to the list and you will be moderated. If you are removed from the list, you
are responsible because I have given you many warnings to STOP. In any event
you don't have an automatic right to say whatever you want under all
circumstances and in all places. Read the Constitution. It says that Congress
shall make no law restricting freedom of speech. It didn't say that your
employer can't restrict what you say, nor does it say that I have to permit you
to go on and on about a subject I said I am so done with. I do not want to go
around cleaning up YOUR mess. You have no right to cause me to do work because
of your intransigence. One more word about this and you get moderated. I've
warned you enough. 73DR
On Sep 26, 2017 1:30 PM, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DRYou did not responds to my very recent points posted and you are putting a
heavy restrictionon my free speech which I will not tolerate. Your objections
is brand new when we havegotten along this way for years and years from the
beginning. The Net you are in charged of is automatically protected from non
members posting on it andtherefore you don't have to do anything when anyone
who is not a member tries to post on it. Moderating as a first step sounds
vague to me and best be careful like being on a slippery slopewith no coming
back. If you delete me from the Net it will be on your head, not RR's or
anyone else. I will continue postinglike I have been including to my Bcc list
and non members like Chuck. In my non humble opinion the Net needs someone like
me to make it interesting and informative then Ineed the Net. My principal
focus is on the AMMV and so called Leftists causes. Stan the Mensch man
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Sep 26, 2017 12:59 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: PROOF BELOW THAT RR HASN'T REALLY BLOCKED ME
Stan, No more sending messages by BCC when you send them to the sparkscoffee
list. You promise to do that or you get moderated right now. In addition, if
any message from you results is moderation work by me, you will be removed from
this list. No more discussion on this. I am so done with this subject. 73DR
On Sep 26, 2017 12:28, "Redacted sender sblumen123 for DMARC"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RR & DRWhen I send a msg to sparkscoffee I want everyone on the Net to see it
plus as an option I frequently but not alwayssend the same msg to my Bcc list.
RR sent a msg he was blocking me which he had also done before to DR & me,
which had meant to both of us hewasn't going to see our posts when he could
have easily deleted without reading it. Why else would he say he is
blockingboth of us? In fact he has been ignoring my posts pretending not to see
them until just recently made the mistake of responding toone of them? Also, he
sometimes responded to our posts because another member who wan't blocked
repeated our post in their post.But this time RR responded directly without it
being in another member's post. Do you understand what I am saying? Stan the
misunderstood man
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Sep 26, 2017 9:55 am
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: PROOF BELOW THAT RR HASN'T REALLY BLOCKED ME
Stan,
It is very simple. Instead of using To: or Cc: to address your emails to
several adresses use Bcc: when one of the addresses is this group.
When you do that people who reply to your emails will reply to only to and not
to this list as well, because if they reply to this list it gets blocked
because they are not a member of the list and this makes more work for DR.
Use Bcc: , not To: or Cc: Got it? End of discussion.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr."
Sent: Sep 26, 2017 6:56 AM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: PROOF BELOW THAT RR HASN'T REALLY BLOCKED ME
Do you understand the problem now? 3. All of a sudden you have come up with
Moderator, Error Messages, Messes, Clean Up, terms we never heard of before?
I understand that a non-member is not allowed to post on our net but
members can post messages from from non-members to explain our points and
even other's points of view which RR does all the time.and that is free speech
for the benefit of all. Whats the mess and where is the damage?
The problem comes when you address another person who is not a member of the
email list. When that person responds, moderators receive messages that the
message will be held pending moderation by the moderators. This happens for
each such message. I don't like doing this especially when I have been asking
you to STOP doing this. This subject is closed, I am not going to discuss it
further, if you continue this subject after I have repeatedly replied to you
privately and publicly, I will moderate you so that your email no longer posts
automatically to this list. Can't you understand that I have been dealing with
your doing this for almost ten months? I am done with this. 73 DR
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
____________________________________________________________
We Say GoodBye To Sally Fields
iflperfecttouch.com
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/59cc0991b2ade991323ast02vuc
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
