[softdevnet] Re: Sta mislite o ovome?
- From: "Sinisa Dolinac" <sinisa.dolinac@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: softdevnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:50:33 +0100
Pridruzujem se Vladanovim pozdravima vezanim uz jos jedan ponedjeljak. :)
Nisam bas nesto pratio rad ove komisije, ono sto znam znam vrlo povrsno i iz
trece ruke. Ivica M. je na jednoj kavi poveo raspravu o ovome. Njegovi
argumenti su bili vezani uz to da standard vec postoji (dakle prva tocka) te
da se treba drzati otvorenog standarda. Nije spominjao ostalo, barem koliko
se ja sjecam. Ivice, znas li ti sta vise o ovome?
Nedavno sam procitao negdje, mislim da je bila vijest na slahdotu, da je
veci problem u tome sto je MS privukao jako puno drugih kompanija /
pojedinaca u kampanju za ovo a sada kada je to proslo onemogucen je rad
komiteta koja stoji iza ovog standarda zbog kvoruma i sl.
Evo, nasao sam vijest na slashdotu pa ako koga vise zanima:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/16/207205
Sinisa D.
On 10/29/07, Vladan Strigo <vladan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ja sam protiv uvodenja redudantnih (a kamoli nedostatnih) standarda.
>
> Sad je samo pitanje da li je ovo sve istina, odnosno koji su razlozi
> nedostatka koji se spominju dolje (sumnjam da "featuri" koji fale, fale
> slucajno... volio bih cuti razloge)
>
>
>
>
> E i dobro jutro svima, sretan vam jos jedan pon. :)
>
>
> --
> Vladan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: softdevnet-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:softdevnet-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Branimir Topic
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 7:27 AM
> To: softdevnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [softdevnet] Sta mislite o ovome?
>
> Sta mislite o ovome?
>
> *
> NO to the Microsoft Office format as an ISO standard*
>
> I ask the national members of ISO to vote "NO" in the ballot of ISO DIS
> 29500 (Office OpenXML or OOXML format) for the following reasons:
>
> 1. There is *already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format
> (ODF)*: a dual standard adds costs, uncertainty and confusion to
> industry, government and citizens;
> 2. There is *no provable implementation of the OOXML specification*:
> Microsoft Office 2007 produces a special version of OOXML, not a
> file format which complies with the OOXML specification;
> 3. There is *information missing from the specification* document,
> for example how to do a *autoSpaceLikeWord95* or
> *useWord97LineBreakRules*;
> 4. More than *10% of the examples mentioned in the proposed standard
> do not validate* as XML;
> 5. There is *no guarantee that anybody can write software* that fully
> or partially implements the OOXML specification *without being
> liable to patent lawsuits or patent license fees by Microsoft*;
> 6. This *format conflicts with existing ISO standards*, such as ISO
> 8601 (Representation of dates and times), ISO 639 (Codes for the
> Representation of Names and Languages) or ISO/IEC 10118-3
> (cryptographic hash);
> 7. There is *a bug in the spreadsheet file format which forbids any
> date before the year 1900*: such bugs affect the OOXML
> specification as well as software applications like Microsoft
> Excel 2000, XP, 2003 and 2007.
> 8. This *standard proposal was not created by bringing together the
> experience and expertise of all interested parties* (such as the
> producers, sellers, buyers, users and regulators), but by
> Microsoft alone.
>
>
> http://www.noooxml.org/petition
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
