[SI-LIST] Re: signal layer between pwr/gnd layers

  • From: steve weir <weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Tegan.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx, silist <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 17:01:00 -0700

Tegan,

There are a couple of issues.  The biggest is that by separating the power 
/ ground pair, the inductance in that cavity will rise.  That will do two 
things, neither of which are good, but are not necessarily disastrous:

1) Increased inductance, sic higher impedance between the decoupling caps 
and any powered IC.
2) Increased EMI due to less energy being required to excite the cavity by 
the taller dimension, and more energy coupled to the cavity by the inserted 
layer.

If you are not using a behemoth processor, or 40A ASIC the increase in 
inductance is less likely to bite you on PDS requirements.  But the 
increased impedance and greater coupling of signal energy could cause some 
real EMC headaches.  Unfortunately, how bad depends on the specifics of 
your system.

Regards,


Steve.
At 03:21 PM 5/18/2004 -0600, Tegan Campbell wrote:
>All,
>In trying to remove two layers from a 16 layer PCB I came up with a question
>I don't know how to answer short of building a board, which there is not
>time for.
>
>I have closed the loop on simulation/modeling vs measurement for a PDS with
>embedded capacitor using a 4 mil dielectric and capacitor array.  I want to
>say thank you to Sun and Xilinx for the excellent work and papers they have
>published in the public domain on the subject.
>
>Now, I am having trouble working out what would happen if I insert a signal
>layer in between the planes.  I need three signal layers to be referenced to
>a pwr/gnd pair, and that currently takes six layers(G-S-S-P-G-S).  If I can
>insert a signal routing layer between pwr and gnd, it drops to five
>layers(S-P-S-G-S). This happens on two different pwr rails.  My first
>reaction is the only difference would be the ~doubling of the distance
>between the planes.  I can decrease this effect by using 3 mil cores.
>
>After thinking a while longer, it seems like there would be other
>differences from the copper in between the planes.  It seems like I should
>be able to minimize the effect by using special spacing rules in the signal
>layer between the planes to maximize the ratio of dieletric area to copper.
>I think this would make the discontinuities in the dielctric(the copper
>traces) insignificant.
>
>I have not found a discussion of this specific PDS topic in the archives,
>and I apologize in advance if I am repeating something that has already been
>discussed.
>
>Any input or thoughts are appreciated, thank you for your time.
>
>Tegan Campbell
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: