I had the pleasure if working with Mike Tsuk (PHD) at DEC who did his thesis on Skin effect and supported all our EM tools. When I left DEC his parting gift to me was a very concise table comparing skin depth versus frequency which I find invaluable (and published with his permission). You can find this table in a paper I wrote comparing lossy versus lossless T-line simulation results. I keep his table on the wall of my cube to refresh my memory how dramatic the skin effect is at high frequencies. Regards and hopefully you will find this helpful. At 1 MHz ~ skin depth is 2.5 mils At 100 Mhz ~ skin depth is .26 mils At 1 Ghz ~ skin depth is .08 mils At 10G ~ skin depth is 26 uinches http://www.iec.org/newsletter/aug06_2/design_eng_1.html Regards Bob -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vachan Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 1:33 PM To: dbrooks7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Skin Effect question I think that is the point of defining a skin depth - An exponential current density is mathematically equivalent to an approximation where you assume uniform current density just below the surface (up to 1 skin depth), and then the current density suddenly drops to 0. On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Doug Brooks <dbrooks7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > This question relates to skin effect. > Consider a current density function with (surface density) Io=8 and > skin depth = .125, unity radius. > > consider the current density function y=8*e^(-x/.125) integrate the > area under this function between 0=<x=<1. The answer is > .9997 (according to the tool I am using!) > > Consider the rectangle formed by the points 0,0, 0,8, .125,8, .125,0 > (Note that x=.125 [i.e. at the skin depth] is where the exponent of e > in the current density function is -1.) the area under this rectangle > is 1.0 (same as the area under the current density function.) > > Here is my question. Is this a fortunate coincidence or can this > identity be proven mathematically? > > > Doug has a new e-mail address dbrooks7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx check out the > free resources at http://www.ultracad.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > -- Vachan ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu