Paul, et.al, I think the I/O shield isolation from digital ground concept is an outdated EMC concept used for analog, low speed systems. Multi-point grounding works. Provide board grounds with the proper aspect ratio relative to the primary frequency of operation (lambda/20), use short, fat, standoffs (as much surface area as you can get)to the chassis, and use a bulkhead type connection scheme. External common mode ferrites can be used on the cables in question if you bulkhead mount is not at the board, or you can get a connector with the ferrite wafer integral to the bulkhead connector. The amount of mating surface area between board and chassis is key. Having said all that, provide for the ability to lift one end of the shield, just in case. I've never had to do it, but this is EMC after all. Other than the promises of a politician, there is nothing more undefined than what can happen during certification testing. Ken -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Paul Young Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 5:52 PM To: Anand.Kuriakose@xxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Shield ground isolation Hi, Same to me. Can anyone out there give the answer? Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kuriakose, Anand" <Anand.Kuriakose@xxxxxxx> To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 1:07 AM Subject: [SI-LIST] Shield ground isolation > > Hi All, > > On high speed boards with I/O connections running to outside world, the > shield ground of the connectors should be isolated from the digital ground > if the board has to meet the requirements of EMI/EMC compliance standards. > > Are there any side-effects of isolating the shield ground from the digital > ground? > > > I have seen on some boards, that the isolation is achieved by using ferrite > beads. On few others i have seen capacitors being used b/n shield and > digital ground. > > How are capacitors useful in acheiving isolation? Or are these caps used for > some other purpose, which i am not able to understand? > > What is the best method to achieve this isolation? > > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Anand. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu