Vinayak, well actually that is a very good question. But it also points-out that your project team probably needs to bring in a packaging expert if you intend to succeed. First, let us follow Dr. Archambeault's advice and leave ground to potatoes and carrots. What we want to do is maintain a 50 ohm CPW, or CPWG waveguide from the I/O pad to the PCB. So, even though there will be very substantial inductance, distributed capacitance along the line will maintain the impedance. To the extent that the two halves of the diff. pair couple, the even mode impedance needs to be raised a little bit to maintain the differential impedance at 100 ohms. Now when this thing switches, three things will occur: 1) There will be a local redistribution of charge between the driver going high and the driver going low. The shoot through, and local common mode imbalance will determine the amount of charge that gets injected into the local ground network beyond the pair. That is the current that will contribute to SSO between the die and that long, long path back to the PCB. 2) As with 1) the high side supply will see some amount of noise current injection due to the imperfections. 3) Two wave fronts will propagate down the two waveguides you need to implement on their way to the package / PCB boundary. If you reference them to the same rail ( logic common at the I/O cell usually being a good choice ) both from the I/O cell all the way through the package and on the application PCB, then you will minimize the cavity excitation, and most energy will propagate towards your receiver, limited primarily by the material losses. Steve. At 05:54 PM 12/30/2004 +0530, Vinayak AGRAWAL wrote: >I still have one question (please don't be annoyed). > >In all these structures, even with on-chip bypass capacitors, >I suspect the common-mode will still not be properly terminated > >For example in the Figure 29 (of SATA 1.0a specs) though >structure 1 will easily provide 100ohm differential >termination, both the pins are proper 50ohm only if the ground >connection has very small inductance, which is very difficult. >And I don't think bypass capacitor can help in this. So how is >this sort of thing managed? > >Vinayak ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu