Hi, There is separate compliance for chip to chip interface.(xfi interface) Regards bala On 3 Jul 2014 01:38, "edward kowal" <kowal_edward2007@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All, > > I have a question about channel compliance for the SFP+ electrical > standard. In the spec, all I see is host compliance and module > compliance. Am I correct that there is no explicit end-to-end > (chip-to-chip) channel compliance standard masks then? In an application > where there is not necessarily a module-host distinction (or need to > demonstrate compliance separately), then, am I free to choose host/module > compliance points as advantageously as possible from the point of view of > demonstrating compliance, or am I missing something more fundamental in the > spec in this regards? > > Thanks in advance for the guidance, > Ed > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu