Chris I was just suggesting an alternative to the issues discussed see (2). Tom Dagostino Modeling Manager Mentor Graphics Corp. SAE tom_dagostino@xxxxxxxxxx 503-685-1613 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Rokusek [mailto:crokusek@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:07 AM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Question about package models Tom, IBIS actually allows two methodologies for creating T-Line models: 1) EBD - Electrical Board Description 2) [Define Package Model] In order to use an EBD model in a simulation tool, because of its generality, the user may be required to provide more setup information (or at least make more choices) than would be required had a PKG model been used instead. In most instances, use #1 for Boards (e.g. SDRAM), use #2 for packages to make things easier for end users. Chris Rokusek Innoveda > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dagostino, Tom > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:29 PM > To: 'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Question about package models > > > > Don't forget about .ebd models, they have a non-coupled > transmission line model. > > Tom Dagostino > Modeling Manager > Mentor Graphics Corp. > SAE > tom_dagostino@xxxxxxxxxx > 503-685-1613 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Zabinski, Patrick J. [mailto:zabinski.patrick@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:41 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Question about package models > > > > > > Hi guys: > > A couple of questions about the use of package models. > > > > 1) Do any of you use device package models when designing high-speed > > boards? > > Absolutely. Depending upon the package, speed, technology, > etc., the package can completely destroy the signal, and > it's best to know/understand this and find work-arounds > *before* the board is built. > > > 2) If so, what model is preferred, spice/RLC, S-parameter, other? > > Most of the time, we don't have much choice. IBIS provides > simple lumped LRC, while some RF vendors supply S-parameters. > If I have choice, I prefer a spice model that includes > T-lines for "long" (as defined by the edge rate) traces/leads > and lumped LRC for bond wires, vias, "short" leads, etc. > > > 3) If the package is controlled impedance and the device has on-chip > > termination, would you still have a use for the package model? > > Again, yes. In most cases I've seen, if the vendor has > gone through the effort/expense of controlled impedance package > and on-chip termination, you're *likely* safe without > simulation, but it's still worth the effort verification > through simulation. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu