Let's tackle the star vs. daisy chain part of the question with a quick trade-off study: If routing a multidrop bus as a 'star' topology with all legs being equal length, what would the signal from one point on the star look like at all the receive points? On the other hand, if the leg lengths are 'badly' mismatched (i.e. lots of different length stubs), what would the signal look like at the receive points? Short answer, it can look pretty good. So from an SI standpoint, a star topology on something like a PCI bus can be desirable IF the physical constraints allow for it. However, if you want a star topology, you'll need a via field at the center of the star from which all the legs extend. From the above PCI example, that can take up quite a bit of space (board cost!) for the via field. For a system with physical constraints such as a PC with multiple slots, that would also require quite a bit more board space (more cost!) to 'zigzag' your traces in order to match lengths of the legs. But with the length constraints in the PCI spec, one can have an acceptable SI solution in minimal space and thus the reason that a PCI bus in a PC is daisy chained. So there's a first pass at the design trade-offs of the two topologies. A daisy chained PCI bus works for example in the slotted PC environment (low cost) where in an embedded environment (bus completely under your control) the star topology might be the better solution. So the normal SI answer: it depends. Examine your design situation and you'll begin to understand when one works better than the other as well as why specs like PCI get written the way they do. -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karthik P Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 8:31 AM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Query regarding different type of Routing topologies Hi All, Kindly let me know the different type of routing topologies used in PCB. For Instance, advantage and disadvantage over star and daisy chain routing and how to choose. In DDR3, we use fly-by-topology routing. How it differ from DDR2 routing. ThanksKarthik ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu