Bob, I agree with you. PDS and packages and others does play a significant role in SI/EMC. As we try, more and more, to "put" in a PCB signals with "Big bandwith" we should be ready to take in to account effects that we neglected in the past. But we are lucky..:-))) thanks to J.C: Maxwell we have a set of equations that perfectly describe all the effetcs we are interested.... question is: when we will have PCs and software good enough... to simulate all the effects all together:-)))))? Giancarlo Haller, Robert ha scritto: > Hassan, Giancarlo, > IMHO a hybrid SI process is required to handle the complexities of many > of today's high speed PCB's. Complex accurate and complete I/O and > interconnect models are required for high speed links, but do not ignore > packages, power distribution or medium and slow speed networks. Murphy > is always out there and whatever you fail to consider (analyze > adequately) will come back to bite you. > > Regards, > Bob > > Robert Haller > Enterasys Networks > Core Routing - Hardware > Phone: 978-684-1340 > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Ing. Giancarlo Guida > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:48 AM > To: hassan@xxxxxxxx > Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Package SI vs PCB SI > > Hi Hassan, > to my opinion there are at least 2 good reason that explain your > statement. > > SI simulation accuracy depends on 2 factor: > 1) accuracy of the model for the interconections > 2) accuracy of the model fo the I/O Buffer > > it is quite clear that when the data-rates become critical it is > necessary to use a 3D full wave approach in the > interconnect models > > I think that tools like the ones you mention does not have such 3D > solver because they are > dedicated to post-layout analysis of the entire PCB and the usage of an > heavy 3D solver would be beyond their application area. > > May be a similar argument could be used to explain the need to use spice > > model for the I/o buffer instead of the ibis model...but I am not an > expert in this area. > > Regards > > Giancarlo > > > Hassan O. Ali ha scritto: > >> Scott, >> >> Thanks for this excellent response. >> >> I have a question for you SI folks: >> >> Am I right to observe that as the data-rates increase beyond 5Gbps, >> > there is an > >> increasing loss of faith on the previously popular board-level SI >> > tools such as > >> SpecctraQuest (now Allegro PCB SI), XTK, Hyperlynx, ICX, etc. in favor >> > of HSPICE used > >> with field-solver-s-parameter-based inteconnect models? >> >> I was personally surprised to see a notable absence of a focus on such >> > board-level tools > >> in the just ended DesignCon 2006. What does this all mean? Is >> > Darwinism (survival of the > >> fittest) at play here? >> >> I'd appreciate your responses. >> >> Best regards. >> >> Hassan. >> >> >> >> On Feb 14, Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> Prasad >>> The theory is the same,whether you are dealing with packages, system >>> > in > >>> package, MCM or PCB. However, the details will change quite a bit. >>> > PCB > >>> SI tools tend to assume that all routing is orthogonal, or aligned at >>> > > >>> increments of 45 degrees. This makes sense, since orthogonal and 45 >>> degree diagonal routing are extremely efficient with respect to space >>> > > >>> utilization. An assumption is therefore made by the PCB trace >>> extraction tools that two traces are either parallel, or they are >>> > not. > >>> If they are parallel (as defined by parallelism on the 8 compass >>> directions) then coupling is calculated. If not, no coupling is >>> calculated. For all other traces, with non-45 degree angles, or >>> different angles, they are assumed to be uncoupled and independent. >>> > As > >>> I said, for PCB designs, this is often a reasonable assumption. But >>> > for > >>> aggressive PCB design where odd-angle routing is used for maximum >>> > trace > >>> density between parts, and for MCMs and packages, where routing often >>> > > >>> radiates from a die in the center out to the balls, PCB-type trace >>> modeling software can be woefully inadequate. That's where you start >>> > > >>> getting into the problem of non-uniform coupled transmission lines >>> > and > >>> imperfect planes with large numbers of perforations. >>> >>> Current density on package power and ground planes is much higher >>> > than > >>> that on PCB planes, causing additional SSO, SSN problems that are not >>> > as > >>> likely to impact signals on a PCB. As a result, analysis of package >>> > SI > >>> usually involves a combination of 3D solvers, and complete simulation >>> > of > >>> the package signal, power, ground and return paths. Books like Eric >>> Bogatin's give you all the basic information that you need. You can >>> then expand your knowledge with Brian Young's book, Digital Signal >>> Integrity, which has a very good discussion of partial inductance and >>> > > >>> package measurements, Clayton Paul's book, Analysis of Multiconductor >>> > > >>> Transmission Lines, which is still the fundamental theoretical book >>> > on > >>> TEM transmission line modeling, and Luc Martens book, High-Frequency >>> Characterization of Electronic Packaging, which gives a good overview >>> > of > >>> modern package characterization techniques. >>> >>> At the IC level, SI becomes even more difficult. There are no ground >>> > > >>> planes, only power and ground meshes. Multiple modes of propagation >>> > can > >>> exist, including slow-wave mode, where the electric and magnetic >>> > fields > >>> decouple, due to the semiconductor properties of the dielectric, >>> > rapidly > >>> increasing propagation delays, and causing significant dispersion. >>> > Ed > >>> Sayre, III, on this list, has some background in this area. I am >>> > sure > >>> there are others lurking on this list that also have significant >>> experience in on-chip SI. >>> >>> Best regards and happy learning, >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> >>> Scott McMorrow >>> Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC >>> 121 North River Drive >>> Narragansett, RI 02882 >>> (401) 284-1827 Business >>> (401) 284-1840 Fax >>> >>> <a >>> >>> > href='http://www.teraspeed.com</a>'>http://www.teraspeed.com'>http://www > .teraspeed.com</a > >> >> >>> Teraspeed(r) is the registered service mark of >>> Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC >>> >>> >>> >>> prasadsa wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for all your mails. Many of these books talk about refers to >>>> > SI on > >>>> Boards. But i am looking in particularly for books on IC-Package if >>>> > any or > >>>> does the same theory (books) holds good on IC-Package also. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Prasad S A >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Coe, Stephen" <scoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: <qazi@xxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:54 AM >>>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Good book >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Let me add my 2 cents :=20 >>>>> >>>>> "High-Speed Circuit Board Signal Integrity"=20 >>>>> >>>>> by Stephen Thierauf >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>>>> On Behalf Of Qazi Arif Iqbal >>>>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 6:37 PM >>>>> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Good book >>>>> >>>>> Eric Bogatin's "Signal Integrity Simplified" is another excellent >>>>> > book. > >>>>> Qazi=20 >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>>>> On Behalf Of Doug Martens >>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 8:25 PM >>>>> To: akhilesh.chandra@xxxxxx; prasadsa@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Good book >>>>> >>>>> Black Magic is written by Howard Johnston and it is a good book. >>>>> Another good book is from Lee Ritchey called "Right the first Time: >>>>> > a > >>>>> practical handbook on high speed PCB and System design" >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>>>> On Behalf Of Akhilesh CHANDRA >>>>> Sent: February 5, 2006 9:19 PM >>>>> To: prasadsa@xxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Good book >>>>> >>>>> Hello Prasad, >>>>> >>>>> In my view for signel integrity best book is "BLACK MAGIC" I = >>>>> forgot=3D20 >>>>> the name of the writer. I will serch it on net and inform you soon. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Akhilesh >>>>> >>>>> prasadsa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> Can you please suggest me a good book for IC-Packaging / SIP >>>>>> > Technology > >>>>>> >>>>>> & SI book on the same subject. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>> Prasad >>>>>> >>>>>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> This e-mail is intended for the use of the individual or entity >>>>>> > named > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> above and may contain information that is confidential and >>>>> privileged.=3D20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >>>>>> > that any > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly >>>>> prohibited. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us >>>>>> > immediately > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> at prasadsa@xxxxxxxxxx and destroy the original message.=3D20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> While this e-mail and any attachments have been scanned for common >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> computer viruses and found to be virus free,=3D20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> we recommend you also perform your own virus checking processes >>>>>> > before > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> opening any attachments. =3D20 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> >>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> List FAQ wiki page is located at: >> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.org >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> or at our remote archives: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu