[SI-LIST] Re: Manufacturing Issues

  • From: Mark Craven <mark.craven@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'Thompson, Gary D (Gary)'" <Gary.Thompson@xxxxxxx>, si-list <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:37:25 -0800

I posed these questions to my lead designer and here are his responses:

For Issue 1, we follow the manufactures recommended pad pattern. The amount of 
solder paste deposited on thermal pad is around 50% of the pad size. The solder 
paste pattern has small squares staggered inside the thermal pad with the vias, 
as much as possible, between the solder paste squares. This minimizes the 
solder wicking down through the vias.

For Issue 2, I have not heard of any issues from operations. We always have 
soldermask between the pads on 0603,0402 and 0201 parts.

Regards,
Mark C. 

-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Thompson, Gary D (Gary)
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:14 AM
To: si-list
Subject: [SI-LIST] Manufacturing Issues

Sorry for the somewhat off-topic nature of these questions. Hopefully someone 
here can steer me in the right direction.

I've recently receive a manufacturability review report from a top tier 
contract manufacturer, wherein they made some recommendations that I'm not too 
comfortable with. Part of me says "they're the experts," and I should accept 
their input. The other part wants to sanity check these suggestions just to 
make sure I'm not running down a single-source rat hole :^)

Suggestion 1
We're using more and more QFN type packages that have a thermal ground pad in 
the middle. Typically, we've just spaced vias in a grid on this pad down to 
internal ground layers. The CM says too much solder gets wicked down the vias 
leaving the pad too dry. They recommend we 1) move the vias to the outside 
edges of the pad and 2) cover them or dam them with soldermask to prevent 
solder from flowing that direction. Seems to me most manufacturer-recommended 
footprints I've seen do it the way we do, not the way the report recommended.

Suggestion 2
This report claimed soldermask between pads on 0603 and 0402 discretes left a 
bump between the pads that promoted tomb-stoning. They recommend removal of 
soldermask between these pads. I've never seen this done before, and the CM was 
not able to actually quantify the failure rates due to this soldermask. The 
last thing we want, though, is a solder bridge under an 0402 part...

Anybody else out there heard of this stuff or have recommendations on a more 
fitting place to ask these questions?

Thanks.


==============================================================
Gary Thompson                     Phone: (512) 821-6521
Systems/Applications Engineering  FAX: (512) 821-6810
LSI Corp.                         Mobile: (512) 751-8115
Network and Storage Products      Email: gary.thompson@xxxxxxx
==============================================================------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: