It's a sign of boredom. Give it a rest. On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:00:51 -0700 "Vadim Heyfitch" <heyfitch@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I find it particularly interesting how few subscribes of this > list have > voiced their opinion on this post - coming on either side on the > argument. > Hardly anyone in Silicon Valley I've spoken with is indifferent on > this > subject. > Whether the reluctance to speak up your mind is a sign of fear > or > desperation, it only corroborates agathon's statement about the U.S. > decline > as a technological superpower, as well as a functioning democracy > (my own > conjecture). Engineers have no power/leverage in the U.S. Congress - > corporations do. Engineers seem to have resigned to this fact and > most just > hope that his/her job will be the last to be axed and moved > off-shore... and > if we keep quiet we may be rewarded for "good behavior" by a few > more > month(?) or years (?) of employment. And so we march to the gallows, > in > silence, hectically calculating what an alternative career path > might we > find available (open a coffee shop?, a restaurant?, teach high > school math?, > import kitchen cabinets from China, else?) > Should there be more wars for natural resources - oil/gas/etc - > the U.S. > will be just one of several superpowers - not THE superpower. When > this time > comes, which may happen much sooner than we wish, - the U.S. will > find > itself imperiled by inability of Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin, > Raytheon, and likes to find and hire quality engineers. > Unfortunately, the > U.S. gov does not get it; instead, in its myopic wisdom, it bows to > the > pressures from corporation, who fund election campaigns of our > elected > officials. > > To Ray: I know this topic falls outside of the boundaries of a > purely > technical discussion. However, it's quite relevant/interesting to a > good > number of the list membership - all those in the U.S. for sure. > After all, > we do tolerate trivial /banal questions from the new members - > mostly from > India and China - and replies from numerous U.S. consultants , who > use the > list for self-promotion and contract solicitation. So we should be > as > tolerant of some non-technical yet relevant to the membership > discussions as > well. > Vadim > > > > > *agathon <hreidmarkailen@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote: > > Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:08:10 -0700 > From: agathon <hreidmarkailen@xxxxxxxxx> > To: praveen.srikantaiah@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: ***[Possible UCE]*** [SI-LIST] Re: Job Opening at Wipro > Technologies > CC: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > This is interesting. Let's assume this job posting is real. > After years of displacing U.S. citizens via fraudulent use of H-1B > _and_ L-1 > visas, Wipro has the cajones to post, right in our face, an > offer of employment in India. No quantity of rupees could > compensate. > > Now, some obvious questions arise. > > What U.S. citizen are they expecting to hire? If they don't expect > to, as > anyone can subscribe to the si-list, then what non-U.S. citizen from > what > country would want such a job location? No, the U.S. - as we know - > is a > declining place, so suddenly not producing enough engineers and > other > professionals, it's like the bubonic plague by God, for which India > and > China had to come to the rescue. But, I don't think your typical > U.S. > citizen engineer would take very well to the corruption over there > and stark > class society. > > So, why is Wipro having an issue filling the job with the 'superior' > non-U.S > . > citizen worker? > > Hmmm... possibly is the targeted candidate Indian? Might they be in > the > U.S.? Are there no direct means within India to find such a person? > Evidently not. And evidently a shortage exists within Wipro and > wherever > their tentacles reach. Wait, I thought - as the Indian (and U.S., > unfortunately) press trumpet - the Indian engineer is so much better > and > they produce masses of them? What's the problem finding an Indian > engineer > who also knows a little physics? Gee whiz. So sad. > > I've just heard (BBC I think) that U.S. companies are closing Indian > operations. And, the Indian edge is decreasing due to costs. So, > don't > offer the weak crap that it's demand that's causing the Wipro > posting. > Intel is going to Vietnam, instead. Yep, the race to the bottom. > Even the > Indians might actually catch a clue sometime soon. Americans? No; > too deep > in sleep. I have NEVER met an H-1B/L-1 who could contribute to any > SI > effort and, at Intel on one occasion, only contributed to negative > productivity. > > More likely, Wipro and the like are starting to retrench and build > the home > base. Especially since the H-1B cap wasn't raised. The rampant fraud > in > India has drained off alot of the H-1B slots, leaving Wipro high and > dry. > Well, waddya know, the law of supply and demand does exist. Just not > in the > usual way. Yee ha!! > > "Fraudsters walk away with H1B visas!" > http://seeker.dice.com/olc/thread.jspa?threadID=2421&tstart=0 > "Glen Keiser, Consular Section Chief, US Consulate, Mumbai said, "We > have > found to our regret that Hyderabad and Bangalore are centres of H1B > visa > fraud and that it is not difficult to walk into an operation and > someone > rather forthrightly tell you that they can produce anything to > appear to > qualify for an H1B visa...". The link at the above link has Indian > tv video > describing Wipro's Woes. > > The 5% of their GDP that is tech exports (incl. services) is not > growing as > in the past and the nervousness doth rear its ugly head. Plus, the > only way > to exploit the L-1 visa is to have personnel employed at a "home > base", > ready for transfer to the U.S. - without any protections for U.S. > citizens > whatsoever (not even any H-1B fig leaf protection). > > So, this is a rich thought... Like my mom always said, "the truth > will > out". And it cometh right quick. So I say India should legislate a > US-1 > visa whereby we foreigners may be imported to save the ship. At an > appropriate premium, of course. But, that might have to wait until > AFTER > our Congress has devolved us further, maybe into 3rd World status. > > Obviously, since India is apparently incapable of producing someone > skilled > enough, Wipro is counting on past H-1B exploitation of Indians & > Americans > having produced someone who can do this work from their U.S. > experience > _and_ who now wants to work in Bangalore, ready to continue taking > work from > > U.S. citizens, or others, in their own country. That takes balls. > And a > U.S. Congress bought and paid for. > > > > On 6/29/07, praveen.srikantaiah@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Wipro Technologies' SI group is looking for an SI engineer with > around 10 > > years of experience. The job is based out of Bangalore, India. > Below is > the > > job description. If interested email me. > > > > Regards, > > Praveen > > > > > > Roles & Responsibilities > > PCB stack-up definition, PCB material selection, and layer > assignment as > > per Signal Integrity / Cross talk requirements. > > Do pre-layout and post-layout signal Integrity analysis for > various > > boards. > > Review analysis results and all checks as per guidelines needed by > Wipro > > and client specifications. > > Review Signal quality measurement results and tune models/ > methodology > > accordingly. > > Develop/Enhance/Update methodology based on advancements in Signal > > Integrity / Design complexity. Designs will be in various domains > like > > Telecom, Computing, Embedded, Automotive, Consumer Electronics > etc. > > Skills, Job Requirements > > > > Hands on experience in execution of high speed signal integrity > analysis > > and cross talk analysis on High frequency boards involving > different types > > of models - IBIS, Spice, SLM/MLM/ICM. > > > > Detailed experience with multiple tools like Spectraquest, > Hyperlynx, > > Hspice, ICX etc. required. > > Experience in doing IBIS model validation, Signal Integrity > Analysis of > > PCI express, XAUI or similar interfaces is a must. > > Experience in doing multi board simulations is an added advantage. > > Must have experience in High Speed/ Gigabit speed Signal Quality > > measurements. > > > > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to > > this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > addressee(s) and > may > > contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If > you are > not > > the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or > copy > this > > e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all > copies of > this > > message and any attachments. > > > > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The > recipient > > should check this email and any attachments for the presence of > viruses. > The > > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus > transmitted > > by this email. > > > > www.wipro.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.net > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > ------------------------------ > Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s > user > panel<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48516/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/ yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7+>and > lay it on us. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu