[SI-LIST] Re: High-Speed GHz differential signals routed Broadside Coupled
- From: Bill Dempsey <BDempsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:38:06 -0600
I can't totally concur with the previous poster. Using a well known 2D
solver
I show a variance of only about 1.5% with the shift that was mentioned.
One *attempt* to reduce this shift is to make sure that the traces are
etched on a
core. However, your fabricator may prefer to use the trace/plane pair as
the core
for etch balance. Contact them and find out. If you can use the
trace/trace
as a core you can reduce the shift.
That said the following produced a 100 ohm diff line.
Plane to trace 1: 6 mils
Trace 1 to trace 2: 14 mils (yuck)
Trace 2 to plane: 6 mils
Trace 1,2 thickness: 0.7 mils each (1/2 oz Cu)
Trace 1,2 width 5.5,5.25 (trapezoidal in nature)
Er: assumed constant @ 4.0
Traces aligned: 100 ohms
Traces shifted 2.5 mils (ea): 101.34
If you think about it the trace to plane return doesn't change. Only the
field
between traces *stretches* just a hair which is why you should NOT see
such a drastic change in impedance. A while back I sat down with a top tier
fabricator to go over this and their results matched what I am presenting.
Their
SI guys had intentionally produced shifts in broadside pairs to see the
impedance
change (that everyone was whining about) and it just wasn't enough to worry
about.
However... I use edge coupled diff pairs in 95% of the work that I do.
I will be glad to give you the fabricator's contact info -- OFFLINE!
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Javier DeLaCruz
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:37 AM
To: doug.hopperstad@xxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: High-Speed GHz differential signals routed
Broadside Coupled
Doug,
I've run a variety of simulations on this in the past=20
but a significant hurdle presented itself. While broadside=20
differential coupling appears to improve routability in=20
substrates/PCBs, it is sensitive to layer alignment. Layer-
to-layer registration on substrates and PCBs are too loose=20
to be able to get a repeatable differential impedance. =20
I had, in the past, run 2D simulations of these=20
broadside coupled traces, and the space between the traces=20
was about double the space to ground respectively. In the=20
following diagram, the layers comprised of "G"'s are the=20
reference layer (ground usually) and the "S"'s are the=20
differential signals. The space between the "S" layers would=20
need to be a much thicker core layer. You would not be=20
able to use double prepreg nor a core+prepreg since the=20
thicknesses can vary easily. This issue can be overcome as=20
described, but the alignment issue remains.
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
SSSSSSS
SSSSSSS
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
When the same simulations are run at the extremes of=20
the layer alignment windows, which can be as much as +/- 5mils on=20
PCBs, you will see that you cannot maintain a repeatable=20
impedance. This is illustrated below. This is why, I=20
assume, that this technique is not commonly used in the=20
industry. If a technology emerges for substrates or PCBs=20
that have much tighter tolerances on these layer=20
registrations, and variable layer thicknesses, then the=20
practice may re-emerge. =20
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
SSSSSSS
SSSSSSS
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Thanks,
Javier DeLaCruz
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Hopperstad [mailto:doug.hopperstad@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:58 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: High-Speed GHz differential signals routed
Broadside Coupled
I am looking for feedback if anyone has tried or is using Broadside =3D
coupling for 100 ohm differential GHz signals? And if so, what trace =3D
width and lengths are being used?=3D20
Thanks for your time
D.M. Hopperstad
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at: =20
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
=20
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
