Thanks Mike.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Mike LaBonte <mlabonte@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IBIS specification has this under NOTES ON DATA DERIVATION METHOD:
C_comp is considered an independent variable. This is because C_comp
includes bonding pad capacitance, which does not necessarily track
fabrication process variations. The conservative approach to using IBIS
data will associate large C_comp values with slow, weak models, and the
small C_comp values with fast, strong models.
So yes, it is OK for the numeric values of C_comp to not follow the typ,
min, max order.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pranesh Mahajanakatti
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:40 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] C_COMP value for corners
Hi ,
Is it possible to have C_comp value of a buffer at typical corner lesser
than that in the minimum corner or greater than that of the maximum
corner?
Thanks
Pranesh
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List forum is accessible at:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
