Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At one time, the industry accepted that ESL was constant with frequency,=20 but we now know that is not true. We did see that the inductance varied=20 with measuring the mounted capacitor as opposed to the fixtured component, = and for the most of the manufacturers, the measurements are on mounted=20 components as this represents the use conditions. In the higher capacitance structures, we've been able to see that=20 inductance decreases to some asymptotic level (depending on case size)=20 that we were not able to measure with lower values. Because of this,=20 where the manufacturer measures the ESL may also introduce additional=20 variance between their ratings for similar devices. Some measure the ESL=20 at self-resonance (higher ESLs as KEMET reports) and others measure well=20 above self-resonance"lower is better". If a manufacturer specifies an ESL = for all capacitance values in a case size as constant, then they are=20 using the ESL well above self-resonance. There are cases where this is=20 true, and in their catalogs, they'll include Impedance versus Frequency=20 responses for multiple capacitance values. Based on the capacitance=20 value, and the self-resonance of the Impedance plot, the derived ESL does=20 not match the "claimed" ESL. The fact is that both of these are incorrect. The ESL does decay from the = self-resonant frequency to well above this frequency. The theory is that=20 at self-resonance, the current is spread fairly evenly through the height=20 of the chip, but as frequency increases, the loop compresses until the=20 current is compressed into a minimized loop in the component. The=20 discrepancies in low frequency ESL and high frequency ESL is greatest for=20 those components utilizing the full height of the chip for the electrodes=20 (higher capacitance). Within the next six months, we will be introducing a variable ESL model=20 in our Spice program, concentrating on the higher capacitance values at=20 first. Attached is a layout of the model which incorporates an "RL"=20 circuit in place of a single, fixed "L" component which will simulate this = decaying ESL. In lower frequencies the ESL is based on a summation of L1=20 through L4, but in higher frequencies, L1 and L2 are the only inductive=20 elements, with L1 representing the termination and pad inductances. The=20 parallel resonance is factored by L2 and C2, and a secondary series=20 resonance by L1 and C2. Instead of replacing the existing model, this=20 model may be optional to the existing model. =20 From: Leonard Dieguez <ldieguez@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Joel Brown <joel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"=20 <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: John Oh <JOH@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 07/21/2009 01:35 PM Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Altera PDN Tool Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Joel, I'm not 100 % sure what manufacturer was used when those values where=20 input to the tool but probably AVX or Murata. The values do not represent=20 the mounting inductance since the tool calculates that depending on the=20 mounting style and dimensions that are input to the tool. You can also=20 change your library or use "user values" for ESL /ESR. As with any other=20 EDA tool Garbage in equals garbage out. So check the values for the caps=20 that you are actually using and also check things like the stack up=20 heights Via placement and diameters and trace widths. Leonard Dieguez High Speed IO Applications, Altera Corporation 9330 Scranton Road, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92121 ldieguez@xxxxxxxxxx 858.202.3511 (office) "There are two kinds of engineers - those who have signal integrity=20 problems, and those who will." - Eric Bogatin. -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20 On Behalf Of Joel Brown Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 5:17 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Altera PDN Tool I have been playing around with the Altera PDN tool. When I look at the ESR and ESL values on the Library page it seems the values match very closely with AVX SpiCap3 which makes me think that is=20 were the values came from. When I used Kemet's spice program I get values that are quite different.=20 One which stood out was an ESL of 1.9nh for a .01uF 0402 capacitor. So it makes me wonder if I use the values in the Altera library if the results are going to be anywhere close to reality especially if we are buying capacitors from Kemet or another vendor. I am assuming the ESL values in the Altera library don't include the mounting inductance since they model that separately. Is there any information comparing ESL from different capacitor vendors=20 for 0402 or any other size capacitors? Thanks - Joel ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu Confidentiality Notice. This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise=20 protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are=20 hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or = copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If=20 you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply = e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at:=20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: =20 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 THIS CORRESPONDENCE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF KEMET ELECTRONICS = CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES. If you have received this e-mail= and it was not intended for you, please let us know, and then delete it. = We thank you for treating our confidential information in a courteous and p= rofessional manner. DISCLAIMER: Although we have taken reasonable steps to reduce risks agains= t viruses, the reliability of this method of communication cannot be guaran= teed. It can be intercepted, corrupted, or delayed, or it may arrive incom= plete, contain viruses, or be affected by other interference.=A0 The openin= g of any attachments to this e-mail indicates your agreement to hold us har= mless and release us from liability for any damage sustained as a result of= this transmission. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu