Gert I have to run off to customer meetings that will consume most of the day. I'll take a look at this when I get back to the office. Steve. On 1/12/2012 8:07 AM, Havermann, Gert wrote: > Scott, Steve > > I just doublechecked my driver and receiver deskew settings (twice) to be > sure I'm not measuring wrong. > Rising and falling edge is deskewed to<0.1ps right at the DUT's SMA (open). > I again measured 3 ports . Results are in your text below (a negative number > is when the edge arises at C2 first). > > I didn't capture the absolute timing single ended. I alsways measure one leg > single ended, save the waveform and then attach the other leg and measuring > the skew at the centre of the rising edge (I'm using rho instead of voltage > to see both edges rising). > The Single ended Skew is DUT1: -11ps; DUT2: 6.5ps; DUT3 -24.2ps > I also tested DUT 3 again with the other TDR port, and with -24.0ps I think > that's a fit. > > Any suggestions? (Maybe we can do a "Hands On" at the Tek Booth at DesignCon?) > > BR > Gert > > > ---------------------------------------- > Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH& Co. KG; Sitz der Gesellschaft: > Espelkamp; Registergericht: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRA 5596; > persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: HARTING Electronics Management GmbH; > Sitz der Komplementär-GmbH: Espelkamp; Registergericht der Komplementär-GmbH: > Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr. der Komplementär-GmbH: HRB 8808; > Geschäftsführer: Edgar-Peter Duening, Torsten Ratzmann, Dr. Alexander Rost > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im > Auftrag von Scott McMorrow > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012 18:41 > An: steve weir > Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: [SI-LIST] Re: strange behavior... resent after server error > > Gert > Can you also confirm that TDR Port 1 Cable1(rising edge) + TDR Port 2 > Cable2 (falling edge) = 0. To verify that there is no asymmetry in the TDR > pulsers. > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:32 PM, steve weir<weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Gert, so just to be clear: >> >> Set-up as TDR only: >> >> Port1 --> Cable1 --> Open >> Port2 --> Cable1 --> Open >> Port1_RoundTrip - Port2_RoundTrip = 0ps Calibration --> Correct >> >> Port1 --> DUT+ >> Port2 --> DUT- >> Port1_RoundTrip - Port2_RoundTrip = 16ps --> New reults: DUT1: -3.5ps; >> DUT2: 9.7ps; DUT3: -18.0ps >> >> Port1 --> DUT- >> Port2 --> DUT+ >> Port1_RoundTrip - Port2_RoundTrip = 0ps --> New reults: DUT1: 11.0ps; DUT2: >> -3.0ps; DUT3: 25.5ps >> >> What do you get for absolute values driving single-ended: >> >> Port1 ---> DUT+ >> >> Port1 ---> DUT- >> >> Port2 ---> DUT+ >> >> Port2 ---> DUT- >> >> Steve >> On 1/11/2012 9:16 AM, Havermann, Gert wrote: >>> Scott, >>> the differential delay of the + and - branch of my differential pair >>> is >> 16ps when I feed + with TDR Port1 and -with TDR Port 2 >>> When I switch ports (- with TDR Port 1 and + with TDR Port 2) then I >> measure<1ps delay difference. >>> In addition, the latter result doesn't change much with varying skew >>> at >> the TDR setting, the first result does change (as expected). >>> I did the same test on many Testfixtures before, and I've never seen >> this kind of effect. My guess is that the mix of differential and >> single ended routing is causing this behavior, but I don't have a real >> explanation for it. >>> BR >>> Gert >>> >>> Von: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto: >> scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012 17:52 >>> An: Havermann, Gert >>> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Betreff: Re: [SI-LIST] AW: Re: Stange behavior in skew measurement >>> >>> Gert >>> >>> Let me ask clarifying questions. Are you saying that >>> 1. differential skew is 16 ps? >>> 2. that the difference between differential and common mode delay >> is 16ps? >>> 3. that you get different skew or delay measurements when you >> measure from different directions? >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Havermann, Gert< >> Gert.Havermann@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gert.Havermann@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> Steve, Jeff, >>> >>> thanks for the answer, but the cable is not the issue. I did use >>> "cost >> effective" cable, but they are good enough for this test (and have >> been in the past). The cable was also not really moved during port >> switching as I fixed them with tape to avoid this kind of variances >> and the cables are only 5" long. We also have the phaseflex gore >> cables on our VNAs, and using them shows no difference. >>> I also don't think the TDR Heads are the problem either. As I said, >>> I >> deskewed after switching modes because I know of the timebase >> limitation of these heads. >>> It must be something with the DUT that's causing this behavior. To >>> give >> you more information, the DUT is a Test Fixture for a 25G Backplane >> and is done with FR408 flat weave material. Tracelength is 320mm, most >> of it routed single ended. Differential routed corners have deskew >> features added. The SMAs and transition to the trace shows +/-2 Ohm >> differential Impedance discontinuity and the Traces are all within 3% >> impedance tolerance. Geometrical Length matching was designed to be<1µm. >>> One more information on the results: The single ended skew test >>> (only >> one port attached the other terminated, and then difference of the >> signal >> runtime) showed skew<2ps, thus having a very low differential skew >> seems reasonable. >>> BR >>> Gert >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------- >>> Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH& Co. KG; Sitz der Gesellschaft: >> Espelkamp; Registergericht: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRA 5596; >> persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: HARTING Electronics Management >> GmbH; Sitz der Komplementär-GmbH: Espelkamp; Registergericht der >> Komplementär-GmbH: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr. der Komplementär-GmbH: >> HRB 8808; Geschäftsführer: Edgar-Peter Duening, Torsten Ratzmann, Dr. >> Alexander Rost >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH& Co. KG; Sitz der Gesellschaft: >> Espelkamp; Registergericht: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRA 5596; >> persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: HARTING Electronics Management >> GmbH; Sitz der Komplementär-GmbH: Espelkamp; Registergericht der >> Komplementär-GmbH: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr. der Komplementär-GmbH: >> HRB 8808; Geschäftsführer: Edgar-Peter Duening, Torsten Ratzmann, Dr. >> Alexander Rost >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: >>> si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx >> rg>] >> Im Auftrag von Loyer, Jeff >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012 17:00 >>> An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Betreff: [SI-LIST] Re: Stange behavior in skew measurement >>> >>> Agreed, and just to expand a little bit on this... >>> I've found it useful to monitor the open TDR waveform while putting >>> my >> cables through some contortions. Cables which are not "phase-stable" >> stick out like a sore thumb - you'll see timing shifts and variations >> in the rising edge of the pulse as you wiggle them around. >>> Well behaved cables will appear rock-solid, and you can rest assured >> they will remain so as you move between reference and various DUT >> measurements. Cables which are not phase-stable will cause you all >> kinds of grief. >>> This should be done periodically to all your cables, whether you're >> making TDR or VNA measurements, IMHO. Label the "bad" cables and only >> use them for non-phase-critical measurements (or throw them away). It >> may save you hours of consternation. >>> And yes, you'll see a huge difference between the costly cables >>> (Gore, >> Rosenberger) and cheap ones. >>> Jeff Loyer >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: >>> si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx >> rg>] >> On Behalf Of steve weir >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 7:45 AM >>> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Stange behavior in skew measurement >>> >>> An 8200 with 80E04 heads is capable of consistent and accurate >> measurements. The only thing that Ihave seen with the 8000's and >> 8200's is that you have to be careful that the internal temperature >> stays within the calibrated range. Assuming that you have then I would look >> at the cables. >> How long are your cables, and how good are your cables? >>> Consistency is a good reason to spend the money on a good set of WL Gore >>> cables. And even with Gore cables you want to avoid tight radii, and >>> variations in bend from the time you calibrate to the time you are >>> done >> measuring your DUT. >>> You can try switching cables, and/or using semi-rigid, and/or >>> keeping >> the cables in a very straight and uniform orientation to see if they >> are the main contributor. >>> Steve. >>> >>> >>> On 1/11/2012 7:12 AM, Havermann, Gert wrote: >>>> Hello SI-Fellows, >>>> can someone explain to me the following effect I found in a skew >> measurement: >>>> I use Tek TDS8200 with 80E04 TDR Sampling Heads. I usually make 5 >> separate measurements: 2xdifferential, 2xcommon and 1xsingle ended. >> For diff and common I make a separate deskew up front, due to the non >> synchronized timebase when switching modes. After deskew I measure the >> skew at the open end of the DUT (I know its not the most accureat way, >> but it is quick and served my needs very well in the past). >>>> For the two common and differential measurements I always switch >>>> dut >> ports to check my deskew. Usually both measurements show about the >> same value regardless of the port assignment. This time I had 16ps >> difference, and in addition, one measurement showed just a few fs >> skew, and the other 16ps. Just for sanity check I deskewed a bit more, >> and still one measurement showed just fs while the other changed. >>>> Any Ideas or hints? >>>> >>>> BR >>>> Gert >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH& Co. KG; Sitz der Gesellschaft: >>>> Espelkamp; Registergericht: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRA 5596; >>>> persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: HARTING Electronics >>>> Management GmbH; Sitz der Komplementär-GmbH: Espelkamp; >>>> Registergericht der >>>> Komplementär-GmbH: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr. der Komplementär-GmbH: >>>> HRB 8808; Geschäftsführer: Edgar-Peter Duening, Torsten Ratzmann, Dr. >>>> Alexander Rost >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>>> >>>> For help: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'help' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> List technical documents are available at: >>>> http://www.si-list.net >>>> >>>> List archives are viewable at: >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>>> >>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Steve Weir >>> IPBLOX, LLC >>> 150 N. Center St. #211 >>> Reno, NV 89501 >>> www.ipblox.com<http://www.ipblox.com> >>> >>> (775) 299-4236 Business >>> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free >>> (707) 780-1951 Fax >>> >>> All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved. >>> This e-mail may contain confidential material. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records >>> and >> notify the sender. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Scott McMorrow >>> Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC >>> 121 North River Drive >>> Narragansett, RI 02882 >>> (401) 284-1827 Business >>> (401) 284-1840 Fax >>> >>> http://www.teraspeed.com<http://www.teraspeed.com/> >>> >>> Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting >>> Group LLC >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject >>> field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Steve Weir >> IPBLOX, LLC >> 150 N. Center St. #211 >> Reno, NV 89501 >> www.ipblox.com >> >> (775) 299-4236 Business >> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free >> (707) 780-1951 Fax >> >> All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved. >> This e-mail may contain confidential material. >> If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records and >> notify the sender. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> > > -- > > Scott McMorrow > Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > 121 North River Drive > Narragansett, RI 02882 > (401) 284-1827 Business > (401) 284-1840 Fax > > http://www.teraspeed.com > > Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > -- Steve Weir IPBLOX, LLC 150 N. Center St. #211 Reno, NV 89501 www.ipblox.com (775) 299-4236 Business (866) 675-4630 Toll-free (707) 780-1951 Fax All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved. This e-mail may contain confidential material. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records and notify the sender. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu