-----Original Message----- *****( begin quote )***** CALIFORNIA STATE BILLS http://www.theanimalcouncil.com/CA2007.html This is our eleventh year of email distributions about California state legislation impacting our interests as animal owners. Over the years, many detrimental bills have failed and very few actually were enacted. Stopping bad bills requires skillful, coordinated lobbying and focused grasstops and grassroots efforts timed to critical points in the legislative process. Since last weekend, there has been unprecedented interest in AB 1634, the "California Healthy Pets Act" authored by Assembly Members Lloyd Levine(D-40) of Van Nuys and Pedro Nava(D-35) of Santa Barbara and Senator Alex Padilla(D-20) of Pacoima. Earlier this year, we published information about this bill as it emerged and included it in our yearly survey of new bills on Sunday. We did not include action information, because this would bypass the needed building blocks for eventual success and present needless risks too soon. The good news is that there is great interest in the bill; the bad news is something like, "who let the dogs out to run in pickup packs, madly barking?" THE ISSUES: Authors and bill proponents frame issues, not the opposition. It is critical to listen carefully to them and rebut their issues rather than raise irrelevant or unsubstantiated arguments that undermine our credibility. The proponents' web site http://www.cahealthypets.com has been again updated with more telling information. Please read it carefully and take time to think about it: * A long FAQ page. This reveals the arguments they will make that we must rebut, including public safety from dog bite risk and the need for uniform state law. They also claim that Rhode Island has a mandatory spay neuter law. In truth, this applies only to cats and came about in a very different way. For specifics, see the Rhode Island section of http://www.theanimalcouncil.com/CurrentLegislativeMaterials.html * The dog bite page. Our sister site, http://www.doggonecalifornia.org has been developing dog bite information since the enactment of SB 861 in 2005. This will be another area to address. * A press section. So far, the only item is from the Madera Tribune where the name of animal control director Kristen Gross is familiar from the unsuccessful effort to change the Madera County ordinance a couple years ago. Read this article very carefully, as it also reveals the arguments to be rebutted as we go forward in the legislative process. California bills are "in print" for a month before any action can be taken. Until a bill is assigned to a committee and the file in that office, we need to prepare for dealing with the committee. See our California Legislation: A Basic Primer revised for 2007 to review this process. Send us any questions. No specific hearing date will be determined until the bill is in committee, and then the date is subject to change right up to the day of the hearing. The author needs to have the key witnesses on hand, and this usually requires coordinating travel schedules of several people. THINGS TO DO NOW: California residents can contact their own legislators. Tell then you will be opposing AB 1634, and ask them to not support or co- sponsor it. Once we have a Committee assigned, we particularly need constituents of committee members to write and call. Everyone else can lend backup. Organizations are an important component of California lobbying, and we will need as many as possible for listing on the committee analysis. If you represent an organization such as a cat or dog club, be prepared to follow specific instructions when available. This will require a brief letter on letterhead either faxed, mailed or hand-delivered to the committee. Discuss this with your organization NOW and prepare needed authorization, letterhead, etc. Once an Assembly committee analysis is published, it cannot be changed for additions or corrections, so we need to get it right the first time. Set up email and phone trees now, so we can quickly direct grasstops and grassroots efforts. "Grasstops" are those who might know legislators or their staffs personally or know major contributors. Think of everyone you know. Resist the temptation to fire off communiqués of points that will appear irrelevant to AB 1634 and be used to discredit the entire opposition. There is still much we do not know, such as the position of cities and counties. Some already have much worse ordinances than provided in the bill and would not need to change them, nor would the bill prohibit more restrictive ordinances. Several bills have been lost on the state versus local issue, and this will probably be critical, especially when local agencies are backing this bill. A question might be why? *****( end quote )***** Ginger Cleary - Rome, GA www.rihadin.com <http://www.rihadin.com> "A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves." -- Edward R. Murrow -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 2/27/2007 3:24 PM ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org ============================================================================