The situation in Illinois isn't looking good. Lots of bad pet animal bills, some with a dozen or more co-sponsors, and no strong organization leading the fight. Here's a list of current bills; I hope I found them all but no guarantees! The Illinois Legislative web site is at: _http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/default.asp_ (http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/default.asp) In case you want to look up the details. HB 315 -- 'Animal Population Control Act.' Requires all dogs and cats to be registered (fine of $100 for failure to register), sets up a fund for low cost spay/neuter to be funded from a $3 surcharge on rabies vaccinations and a $1 checkoff on tax returns. HB 707 -- Amends the Illinois Animal Welfare Act to replace the term 'pet shop operator' with 'animal caretaker.' The new definition of animal caretaker is so broad that it covers everyone who sells or gives away a pet, including breeders. An animal caretaker must be licensed by the Illinois Department of Agriculture and the Department may inspect an AC's premises. It adds to the usual animal care requirements that animal caretakers must provide a 'stimulating and enriching' environment. Punishments are increased. 'Hoarder,' already defined very broadly is made even worse by further broadening the definition to keeping 'a number of' companion animals in poor conditions. A second hoarding offense is a felony and each day the conditions continue is a separate offense punishable by 1 to 3 years in prison and up to a $25,000 fine. SB 1063 -- Seems to replace the word 'the' with the word 'the' in the requirements for rabies vaccination. This is most likely a legislative manuver -- what is often called a 'spot' bill because as filed, the bill merely holds a spot for the real thing. Many states have requirements that bills be filed well in advance of the first legislative action so citizens have time to discover and discuss them; maybe plan action. The 'spot bill' is a way to evade that requirement -- the real content will be amended in, in committee. Most likely we won't know what's really in these bills until the first committee hearing. SB 1064 -- Seems to replace the word 'and' with the word 'and' in the Animal Control Act. Another 'spot bill.' HB 1128 -- Changes state's 'deeds not breeds' law so it will permit BSL. HB 1238 -- Seems to replace the word 'the' with the word 'the' in the Humane Care For Animals Act. Another 'spot bill.' HB 2406 -- Long, complex changes to Animal Welfare Act. Among important changes; 'rescue group' is any group or person that does rescue; 'companion animal' (ARspeak for pet) is any dog, cat, or *horse* or anything else you or most people think is a pet; foster homes are limited to four animals not including owned animals and must be sponsored by a rescue or shelter. All the following will need a state license: pet shop operators, dog dealers, kennel operators, cattery operators, guard dog service operators, animal control facilities, animal shelters, dog daycares, animal rescue groups, humane societies, and foster homes. All of those must allow inspection of their premises at any time (not just 'reasonable hours') by the department. There are record keeping requirements. Breeders are exempt from license requirements provided they have five or fewer intact females and 'deal' only their own get. Can you say 'Divide and conquer'? Rescue this year; breeders, we're next, once the rescuers are under control. HB 2447 -- Current law allows localities to register dogs and cats. This would *require* registration but would make microchipping and use of the microchip number as registration number, optional. A registration fee is required but the requirement for registration of litters is removed. It also deletes the requirement that microchips operate at 125khz. HB 2717 -- Seems to replace the word 'and' with the word 'and' in the Humane Care For Animals Act. Another 'spot bill.' UGH!!!! Taken together, these bills give the state complete control over transfers of animals. In practice, that control would be exercised by your local animal control. Of course that assumes the most important parts pass; we don't know how that will turn out. Some bills do conflict; in those cases the committees will adjust things, either by killing one or more bills or by merging provisions of one into another. The spot bills could be used to cover holes (although there are very likely already plans for their contents) -- there's one for each of the four main pieces of existing animal law. I haven't done a lot of this, but this is the worst mess I've ever seen, and by far the largest single-year push. Ginger Cleary, Dallas, GA_ http://www.rihadin.com _ (http://www.rihadin.com/) (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pet-law/) You can't dance if you don't go to the party. _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GA-pet-law/_ (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pet-law/) ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================