Cindy - You appear to have missed the whole point of Elizabeth's article...........which is that the Animal Rights movement has infiltrated us all to the point that we use their terminology and feel that we must apologize for having dogs in kennels. Elizaabeth is more or less telling the Aristas to go and fry ice... As a breeder, it might be more useful to you to understand that the ARistas don't care how much you love your dogs...they want them gone. When anyone apologizes for keeping dogs in kennels, they are appeasing the AR movement............when they claim they are a "replacement for a child long grown" it gives the AR folks more ammunition against us...............and please don't ask for that comment to be explained. It's been done, over and over again, on this list and elsewhere.. It's amazing how many years of preaching against the ARs, and here we still are, knocking people who are trying to educate the rest of the fancy about the AR approach.... No, it is NOT up to anyone else to decide what is right or correct............that's the whole point.......but you missed it.......... Does anyone still think that we aren't going to lose this battle? Think again. Peggy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cinosam GSD" <cinosamgsd@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Showgsd-L@Freelists. Org" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:26 AM Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: [CHGSD-L] I own dogs who live in a kennel and I am a breeder. And thatâ?Ts my final word. > Well who is to say what they should be. Whether it's a dog in a kennel > for breeding or show, or a companion for deceased spouse, or a replacement > for a child long grown.....not really up to someone else to decide what is > right or correct. > > It's interesting that the article trying to justify keeping dogs in > kennels and criticizing those that judge them, is guilty of doing the same > thing. Is this the backlash of kennel owners against people that treat > their animals as members of their family? I find it amazing that we have > become so defensive that we would criticize people that love their animals > unconditionally. > > Can I understand where it is coming from...maybe. People have humanized > dogs to the point of passing legislation that forgets they are animals. > But because dogs are such a big part of American culture, it has also > opened up doors for dog owning households that would have disappeared as > we become more urbanized. As a breeder, I want to know that there are > good homes out there that still want my puppies. Dog parks, hotels that > accept dogs, doggie daycares...are all are geared to busy pet owning > families, and that can only benefit us. If we didn't' as a culture have > such a strong affinity for our furry friends (is it okay to say furry > friends) we might not, as breeders, have homes for our puppies anymore. > > So anyone on these lists that use furkids and fur babies......feel free. > Even though those words have never passed my lips, I'm not threatened by > it in the slightest. Just don't try to pass a law that makes it illegal > for me to keep my dog in a crate. They can't all sleep with me. :o) > > Cindy ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org ============================================================================