[ SHOWGSD-L ] Ohio Dog Bill Hearings

  • From: Crossroadsgsd@xxxxxxx
  • To: showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 23:26:07 EDT

 
 
Hearings  This Week On Proposed 
Ohio Dog And Kennel  Legislation
Please Contact Your  Legislators And Senators
by  JOHN YATES 
American Sporting Dog Alliance 
_http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org_ 
(http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org/)  
COLUMBUS, OH â?? Hearings are scheduled for Tuesday and  Thursday on two pieces 
of legislation that would have a severe impact on all dog  owners and hobby 
breeders in Ohio. 
The  Senate State and Local Government and Veteransâ?? Affairs Committee will 
receive a  reported substitute bill for S.B. 173 (House version is H.B. 223) on 
Tuesday at  10 a.m. in the South Hearing Room. Testimony will not be taken on 
this new bill.  This legislation imposes heavy financial and legal burdens on 
kennel owners.  
On  Thursday, at 8:30 a.m. in the Finance Hearing Room, a hearing will be 
held to  review reported amendments to H.B. 446, which affects all dog owners. 
The House  Local Municipal Government and Urban Revitalization Committee 
reportedly will  take testimony at this hearing. The reported amendments were 
not 
made available  to the public by Monday morning. 
It  appears that an attempt is being made to ram these two bills through the  
legislative process as quickly as possible. 
These two bills take a giant step toward fulfilling the  extreme animal 
rights agenda of the eventual elimination of the private  ownership of animals. 
They would drastically reduce the number of puppies  available in Ohio by 
sharply 
curtailing hobby breeding of purebred  dogs. 
A  Senate fiscal analysis of S.S. 173 shows that additional licensing costs 
will  exceed $300,000 for an estimated 2,000 kennels that would be classified 
as small  hobby breeding kennels. 
Under the legislation, a small breeding kennel is defined  as having between 
nine and 15 dogs, which would impact most hobby  kennels. 
In  addition, the analysis shows, a new supervisory position would cost about 
 $60,000, and an unspecified number of dog wardens would have to be hired at  
$43,000 each. Estimates of the number of new dog wardens needed to enforce 
the  law range from a minimum of 17 ($700,000 a year) to 88 ($3.8 million a 
year),  plus numerous start-up costs. 
These and other expenses would come out of the pockets of  kennel owners. 
Our  prior reports have contained detailed analysis of this legislation, and 
this  report will only summarize. For readers who want an in-depth analysis, 
please  contact us at _asda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:asda@xxxxxxxxxxxx) . 
S.B.  173 (companion to H.B. 223) has the potential to destroy hobby breeding 
of  purebred dogs in Ohio in a misdirected effort to curtail â??puppy mills.â?? 
 
H.B.  446 mandates licensing for puppies at eight weeks of age, increases 
fees,  reduces the age for a spay/neuter differential to six months, gives 
county 
 auditors the power to revoke kennel licenses, and makes it much harder for 
good  Samaritans to help lost dogs. 
Testimony on the bills has been mixed, with only a few  people attending 
previous hearings. However, some of the legislators and  senators asked some 
hard 
questions and expressed doubts. Others, however, have  signed on as cosponsors 
to this legislation. 
The  American Sporting Dog Alliance is supporting Ohio dog and kennel owners 
in an  effort to defeat this legislation, and has offered strong testimony in  
opposition to the two bills. Ohio Valley Dog Owners President Norma Bennett  
Woolf has addressed the hearings on behalf of dog owners. Ms. Woolf has worked 
 tirelessly to defeat this destructive legislation, and she is one of the 
true  heroes of the movement to protect dog ownersâ?? rights. 
We  strongly urge all Ohio dog and kennel owners to take an active role. Your 
 participation and support are crucial. We cannot emphasize too strongly that 
 this legislation stems from an extreme animal rights agenda that aims to 
greatly  reduce the number of dogs as a giant step toward eliminating dog 
ownership  altogether. 
S.B. 173
This  legislation (a companion to H.B. 223) claims to target â??puppy mills,â?? 
but would  have a devastating impact on every kennel that has nine or more 
unsterilized  adult dogs that could be construed as a â??breeding dog.â?? 
Because of 
the  definition and required burden of proof, almost all small hobby breeders 
will be  affected.  
A  breeding dog is defined as any male or female dog that is intended for 
breeding  or has produced one litter in a year, either as a stud dog or a 
mother. 
The law  does not define standards for this definition or for the burden of 
proof, and  the burden of proof rests with the kennel owner. We see this as a 
â??
Catch 22,â?? as  there would be no way to conclusively prove the purpose for 
keeping any dog. It  would a matter of convincing the dog warden to take the 
owner
â??s word. 
This  unvarnished animal rights legislation also grants dog wardens the power 
to  confiscate any dog for which there is probable cause to call a breeding 
dog. The  standards for probable cause are not defined, but could be construed 
as any dog  that has the potential for being bred. 
To  obtain a breeding license, a kennel owner would have to pay an annual fee 
 ranging from $150 to $750, submit to inspections by state officials, provide 
 proof of insurance, purchase a bond guaranteeing financial liability, submit 
to  a personal background check by the police, be fingerprinted and obtain 
and use  an approved vendor number to advertise or sell a dog or puppy. 
Inspections would open any area that houses dogs to state  officials without 
a warrant, including the ownerâ??s home. Papers, documents and  bank records 
also could be examined or subpoenaed. 
Citations can be given and fines levied for violations or  â??threatened 
violations,â?? which are not defined. Any hearing, trial or appeal of  an 
action must 
be done through only one Ohio court, in Franklin  County. 
The  inspections would be based on providing a specified level of physical 
care in  housing, sanitation, medical care and food and water. 
They  would require a kennel to be cleaned every 12 hours, mandate 
professional  veterinary care for even minor conditions, injuries or ailments, 
require  
grooming and nail trimming, mandate vaccinations, deworming and heartworm  
prevention, and require available water at all times, even in freezing  
weather. 
Here  is a link to the actual text of this legislation: 
_http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_SB_173_ 
(http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_SB_173)  . 
We  urge dog and kennel owners to submit written comments to each member of 
the  committee. Emails, letters and phone calls all are important. This is  
urgent! 
This  link will take you to a list of the committee members: 
_http://www.senate.state.oh.us/committees/com_state.html_ 
(http://www.senate.state.oh.us/committees/com_state.html)  . A page will open 
up giving you a link to each  senator
â??s email and mailing addresses. 
HB 446
Every dog owner will be affected by HB 446. 
It  says: 
    *   Puppies must be licensed for $10 apiece at eight weeks  of age, and 
also must wear a collar and license tag at that age. A puppy must  be 
registered and licensed before it can be sold or transferred. Unlicensed  
puppies and 
dogs can be confiscated.
    *   Individual dog licenses would rise from $2 to $10 per  year, and 
kennel license costs would rise from $10 to $50. The extra charge  for 
licensing 
for a dog that is not spayed or neutered will be imposed on dogs  at six months 
of age, instead of the current nine months
    *   Kennel licenses would be required for anyone who raises  a single 
litter of hunting dogs. The bill says: â??A kennel owner is a person,  
partnership, 
firm, company, or corporation professionally engaged in the  business of 
breeding dogs for hunting or for sale.â??
    *   A particularly onerous part of the legislation gives  county auditors 
the unrestricted power to revoke kennel licenses (this  includes anyone who 
raises a single litter of hunting dogs) for unproven  allegations of animal 
cruelty. County auditors do not have the qualifications  to make judgments 
about 
animal cruelty, and the guilt or innocence of a dog  owner facing such 
accusations should be determined only in a court of law.  This power is given 
to 
auditors â??if the auditor determinesâ?? that a violation  of animal cruelty 
statutes 
has occurred. No limits are placed on this power,  and the legislation does 
not define any criteria for an auditor to use. In  fact, the law gives an 
auditor the power to revoke a license if he/she simply  feels that a kennel 
owner 
may have violated cruelty statutes, or even  extra-legal personal opinions 
about what constitutes cruelty.
    *   Good Samaritans who find a stray dog must notify  authorities within 
two days and turn it over to the animal control agency  within 10 days, and do 
not have the option to give the dog to a no-kill  shelter or rescue group, or 
find someone to take the dog if its owner cannot  be found. This exposes the 
dog to a high probability of  euthanasia.
Other provisions regulate dogs that are declared  dangerous, cats, ferrets 
and other animals. 
The  purpose of greatly increased fees is to make law-abiding dog owners pay 
for the  cost of animal control in Ohio. The unfairness and irrationality of 
this  approach is that responsible dog owners and breeders, who are perhaps the 
least  likely cause of the problem, are the people who are being forced to 
pay for  it. 
Breeders and owners of purebred dogs rarely burden animal  control agencies 
and animal shelters. Moreover, purebred puppies almost never  are found in 
municipal animal shelters. This legislation makes responsible dog  owners and 
breeders the â??cash cowâ?? that will be milked to pay for animal control  
efforts 
directed at irresponsible people who ignore the law. ASDA regards this  as the 
unethical exploitation of law-abiding citizens. 
People who actually violate the law should pay for the  cost of enforcing it, 
through fines and other penalties. This cost should not be  borne by 
law-abiding dog owners. We should not be held responsible for the  actions of 
others, 
over which we have no control. 
We  urge dog and kennel owners to submit written comments to each member of 
the  committee. 
Here  is a link to the text of the legislation: 
_http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_HB_446_ 
(http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_HB_446) . 
This  link will take you to a list of the committee members: 
_http://www.house.state.oh.us/jsps/Committee.jsp?ID=21_ 
(http://www.house.state.oh.us/jsps/Committee.jsp?ID=21) . Please click on each 
memberâ??s name. A page will open up  
giving you a link to the legislatorâ??s email and mailing addresses. 
Please feel free to use any information contained in this  report, and also 
to cross-post it and forward it to your friends. 
The  American Sporting Dog Alliance is the unified voice of sporting dog 
owners and  professionals in America. We work at the grassroots level to defeat 
unfair  legislation and policies that are harmful to dogs and the people who 
own 
and  work with them. Our work to protect your rights is supported solely by 
the  donations of our members. Your participation and membership are vital to 
our  success. Please visit us on the web at 
_http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org_ 
(http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org/) . 
Have You Joined Yet?
The American Sporting Dog  Alliance
_http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org_ 
(http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org/) 



Cathleen Bennett & Joe Guay
Rialto, Ca
_www.crossroadsgsd.com_ (http://www.crossroadsgsd.com/)   
Raised with LOVE, Sold with Care
Updated Web site
Puppies  Here




**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family 
favorites at AOL Food.      
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Ohio Dog Bill Hearings