PERMISSION TO CROSS POST On Wednesday, New Mexico House Bill 400, Dangerous Dog Act, was tabled in the House Judiciary Committee. Then, unannounced, on Friday a committee substitute bill for HB400 was heard by the Judiciary Committee. The substitute bill was given a â??Do Passâ?? and is on the House Temporary Calendar for Sunday, March 6. On Monday, March 7, the bill will be placed on the House Calendar for a floor vote. Members of the New Mexico House of Representatives need to be contacted IMMEDIATELY to OPPOSE THIS LEGISLATION (HB400). The SUBSTITUTE BILL DOES NOT resolve key issues previously raised. It remains a poorly written law. The provisions in HB400 for a â??potentially dangerous dogâ?? are vague and could be used to target responsible owners. If your dog runs to a fence (that appears too low) and barks menacingly at a stranger, the dog could be declared â??potentially dangerousâ?? and seized. If a â??potentially dangerous dogâ?? attacks a chicken, the owner could be sentenced to 18 months in the state penitentiary. If the owner fails to report the death of a â??potentially dangerous dogâ?? in 5 business days, the penalty is one year in the county jail and could be 18 months in the state penitentiary. The definition of â??dangerous dogâ?? SHOULD be based on an UNPROVOKED attack on a PERSON. However, this law DEFINES â??dangerous dogâ?? as a dog that causes serious injury to a person OR domestic animal â?? REGARDLESS OF CIRCUMSTANCES. To add to the confusion, a dog can be DEFINED as dangerous, but may not be DECLARED to be dangerous. Provisions in HB400 about attacks on domestic animals conflict with existing state statues regarding attacks on livestock. Furthermore, this law does NOT ban breed specific laws. State statues currently impose a penalty of one year confinement and a $1000 fine for any person who keeps any animal known to be vicious and liable to attack or injure a human being (unless the animal is securely kept to prevent injury to a person). Dogs that attack or kill livestock are to be killed and the owner held responsible for all damages. These, as well as other, existing provisions of state statutes and administrative code, provide a good starting point for dangerous dog legislation. Simple amendments to existing state statutes would be more effective than HB400. Your help is needed to OPPOSE this legislation. Express your concerns to members of the House. Time is very short. Contact information is provided below. Ron Gustafson 505-864-3513 Link to the New Mexico State Legislature: _http://legis.state.nm.us/lcs/default.asp_ (http://legis.state.nm.us/lcs/default.asp) Ginger Cleary, Dallas, GA_ http://www.rihadin.com _ (http://www.rihadin.com/) (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pet-law/) "When your response to everything that is wrong with the world is to say, 'there ought to be a law,' you are saying that you hold freedom very cheap." Dr Thomas Sowell _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GA-pet-law/_ (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pet-law/) ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================