[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Musings-CURRENT American GSD Standard
- From: "Pam Stoesser" <pkstoesser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:00:55 -0500
Disqualifications:
Cropped or hanging ears
Dogs with noses not predominantly black.
Undershot jaw.
Docked tail.
White dogs.
Any dog that attempts to bite the judge.
The Standard (along with the disqualifying faults) is on the GSDCA.org
website under "Education" and "Breed Standard". . .
-----Original Message-----
From: RopajaGSD@xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 10:10 PM
To: Showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Musings-CURRENT American GSD Standard
Other than "biting the judge", which would be a temperament issue unless of
course the judge threatened the owner/handler and then the dog would not
have a temperament issue but would be displaying his most basic instinct
that
of protecting his "master" would he not? Comments welcomed! The other
disqualifying fault as it stands now is "noses that are not predominately
black"... So who is going to stand up for the "no quite black" noses? Do
you need
a predominately black nose to herd, to gait, to be a service dog, to
participate in any of the performance arenas...Livers, blues etc as coat
colors
are already noted as being faults, so the "noses that are not predominately
black" does not relate to barring livers or blues.
IF it were to be voted on that a GSD with a white coat (masking another
color) is no longer a disqualifying fault, than one would think that the
"noses
that are not predominately black" should also loose its disqualifying
status for some of the same reasons...I guess to rule out albinos, you might
have
to substitute that a "pink" nose was a disqualifying fault; but then what
would you do with the temporary condition known as a "snow nose"? So many
things to consider when one is considering change; all change results in
consequences of some sort or another. I guess the question would be, does it
solve a serious problem or does the change create another one of equal
value?
If I remember correctly and I am sure someone will speak up if I am wrong
on that...but at one point, obviously prior to the change in 1969; the
standard read that while white was not desirable, if it showed albino
characteristics, (would this have been pink noses, lips, pads, genitals and
red eyes or
at least pink rimmed), it would have to be disqualified...
Just musing - LOVE discussions! There are so many diverse opinions, some
based on facts others based on hearsay or own desires...but ALL very
interesting!
Pauline Moon - _http://www.ropajagsd.com/_ (http://www.ropajagsd.com/)
Ropaja German Shepherds:Member-GSDCAmercia & GSDCAtlanta - Best In Show AKC
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2011. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
