H.R. 669 Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act. Take Action! Bans most nonnative species kept as pets! April 29, 2009 Update on HR 669 On Thursday April 23, The House Subcommittee on Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife, chaired by Re presentative Bordallo of Guam, met to hear presentations on HR 669. Speakers were allowed five minu tes each and also submitted formal reports for the Congressional Record. Only selected speakers wer e allowed to present information, including a USFWS official, a state official from Arizona, a biol ogist from Notre Dame, a fish farmer, and Marshall Meyers of the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Counci l who presented information for NAIA and many other organizations. Over seventy organizations are on record as responding against HR 669, representing bird, mammal, f ish, and reptile interests. Over 50,000 individual emails and faxes were submitted against HR 669. NAIA supporters sent a flood of messages through our Capwiz lobbying tool -- literally thousands -- to Representatives prior to the hearing. Patti Strand, NAIA National Director, submitted a two pag e letter in opposition to the bill, which was presented the day of the hearing. Committee members w ere quite surprised at the strong interest in this bill and the responses from their constitutents. Thank you for taking action and making a difference! Speakers indicated the bill needs more work. Representative Bordallo indicated that the hearing wou ld be open for ten days to receive additional input. Since this bill was presented during the last session of Congress, and has strong support from Defenders of Wildlife, Nature Conservancy, Union o f Concerned Scientists and the HSUS, it is expected that changes will be made in the bill to make i t more palatable to the public. This does not mean the bill will be acceptable to those with intere sts in nonnative species. In one internet media blog, Michael Markarian, HSUS VP, reportedly stated the following: "First, the bill is aimed at exotic wildlife, not domestic household pets. It includes a specific e xemption for cats, dogs, rabbits, goldfish, and horses. And the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is a llowed to add more exempted species as it sees fit. The HSUS and HSLF are specifically requesting t hat hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs, and ferrets be added to the exempted list." This is an indication that there will be attempts to make the bill appear non threatening to owners and breedes of nonnative species. However, while we remain hopeful, we do not expect any positive changes in this bill due to the agenda of those making the changes. We recommend that individuals continue to contact their Representatives and express their concerns about interstate transport of their animals, the ability to sell or give away their animals, and th e ability to breed their animals, all of which would be prohibited under HR 669. As further changes occur, we will update this message. HR 669 bans import, export, transport, breeding, sale or barter of ALL nonnative species unless the y are placed on an Approved List established by the USFWS after extensive study. This law would aff ect most pet owners of non native species. Most pet birds, ornamental aquarium fish, reptiles and small pet mammals are nonnative species and would be ILLEGAL under this act, unless placed on the Approved List! Any company manufacturing or selling product for these pet species would be affected by this act. T his means hundreds of thousands of pet birds and animals, reptiles and fish would be affected Thousands of small businesses involved in any aspect of the pet industry, from breeding, selling an d transporting animals to manufacturing and selling products for animals, such as foods, toys, and equipment. HR 669 was introduced by Del Madeleine Bordallo of Guam, the Chair of the Subcommittee of Insular A ffairs, Oceans and Wildlife of the House Natural Resources Committee with the purpose of preventing the import of nonnative species which might be harmful to humans and to the environment or a nuisa nce to agriculture or horticulture. Click here to read HR 669. Most of the nonnative invasive species introduced into the U.S mainland or islands were inadvertent ly introduced through ballast water in ships or as stowaways in cargo shipments (which is how the B rown Tree Snake entered Guam). Most nonnative species that are causing problems in the US mainland were NOT imported animals; domestic cats gone feral are likely the most common exception. At the present time, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Lacey Act is required to demonstr ate that a nonnative species is injurious or harmful to humans or the environment before it can be prohibited. HR 669 would require that nonnative species are prohibited until the USFWS proves that the nonnativ e species is not a threat. Such a process would be extensive, costly, take a lot of time. It would waste taxpayer money since it would apply to many thousands of nonnative species which have histori cally existed as pets in the US and have not been demonstrated to be a threat to humans or the econ omy or the environment. HR 669 requires the USFWS to do a risk assessment on each species and then place it on an Approved or Unapproved list. Since the timeline, staff and financial resources for doing this is in short su pply, the USFWS will be unable to accomplish the task for most nonnative species already in homes. All species that did not appear on the Approved list would be banned: import, export, transport, ba rter and breeding would not be allowed. There are no exceptions for pet owners! Most of the nonnative species kept as pets in the US have never posed a problem to humans or the en vironment. Yet all these species would have to be evaluated and approved or they would be ILLEGAL t o possess, breed, import, export, transport, and barter or sell! While it is important to protect our environment and analyze whether or not a specific species pose s a risk, this bill as presently written does not provide a realistic and achievable solution to th e problem. Enhancing and enforcing present regulations under the Lacey Act would be more cost effective and sa ve time and taxpayer dollars while protecting our environment and economy. PLEASE CONTACT THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and voice your opinion using the lobbyin g tool below where you can send your opinion and include talking points provided if you wish. Also use faxes and phone calls to YOUR Congressperson, and where possible, visit their local office . Personal face-to-face contact is very effective. If you received this email from a friend, be sure to sign up HERE to receive NAIA Trust alerts in t he future about important animal legislation in your state -- and nationally. JOIN OUR 18 YEAR MOVEMENT DONATE TO NAIA TRUST TODAY! Copyright © 2008. National Animal Interest Alliance Trust. All Rights Reserved. Join Now! | Subscri be to Newsletter If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here. -- Stormy Hope www.carpoc.org AKC Legislative Liaison, GSDCA Sunshine Squad <showgsd.org/sunshine.html) GSDs and more -- Stormy Hope www.carpoc.org AKC Legislative Liaison, GSDCA Sunshine Squad <showgsd.org/sunshine.html) GSDs and more ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2008. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/ ============================================================================