[ SHOWGSD-L ] Continental Kennel Club/PAWS

  • From: RihadinK9@xxxxxxx
  • To: showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:25:09 EDT

I have been saying this for years!
 
PERMISSION TO CROSSPOST.

I just received a phone call from a  local Fancy member who has been active  
in breeding/showing for more than  twenty years.  She called because she was  
looking in our local paper  and could only find three listings for AKC dogs 
among hundreds of CAC  listings.  She said that she had not looked at the ads 
in 
 the paper  for some time and what she saw shocked her.  â??What happened to  
all  
the AKC breeders?â?? she asked.  I told her I was aware of the  problem  and 
had been seeing it get worse for many years.   

Then, I asked if she remembered the presentations that I had made to  our  
kennel club on this very issue.  The point of my presentations  was that the  
Fancy was killing itself by being so choosy about whom they  sold dogs to and 
by 
 charging so much for pets.  She remembered.   She said that she had no  idea 
that the situation was this bad.   She added that AKCâ??s inspections  were 
also a problem and said the  inspectors were like â??Nazis.â??  She also  
disliked 
the AKC rule  requiring that each dog wear a collar with its name on  it.  She 
said  she knew all her dogsâ?? names and did not need a collar to  remind her.  

Over the years this woman and I have discussed the Fancy and  animal  rights. 
 She is a bit â??AR-fuzzy.â??  For example, she  rarely  breeds.  I have never 
known her to have more than one litter  every couple  of years.  She is very 
proud of who gets her dogs but  does not, however,  charge exorbitant prices 
for 
them. She told me today  that she thought I had  exaggerated the problem â?? 
until 
now.   

What problem?  It is that the AKC has been committing a slow  suicide  for 
years.  It has done so in an attempt to placate  philosophical  extremists.  
Did 
these extremists march, armed, in the  front door and  demand anything of the 
AKC?  No.  Instead, they  read â??The Art of  War.â??  Not only did they read 
it, they studied it.  They plotted, they  planned and they went into action.  
They  
propagandized and perpetrated  misrepresentations and lies.  They  did it by 
speaking to the hearts of dog  lovers, not their minds.  Ultimately, they 
infiltrated.  Inserting  actual dissidents was not  necessary.  They had 
sycophants sympathetic to  their cause.   These sycophants, some of them in the 
Dog 
Fancy, urged the  AKC to  change.  Members of the Fancy who helped convince the 
AKC were not   even aware of the AR influence.  Yet, the result was that the 
AKC  slowly  morphed away from being merely a registry and into an  
â??all-purposeâ??
  organization.  

How did this happen?  When  animal rightsâ?? extremists accused the AKC  of 
irresponsible breeding, the  Fancy got more â??responsible.â??  When AR  
extremists 
accused the Fancy  of being â??puppy millers,â?? the Fancy bred fewer  litters. 
 
When AR  extremists accused the Fancy of breeding for profit and  not caring 
who got  their puppies, the Fancy began treating the sale of puppies  like  â??
adoptions.â??  When AR extremists accused the Fancy of breeding for   
â??vanity,â?? 
the Fancy started testing for all the potential genetic problems  for  which 
they could possibly test.  When the AR extremists accused  the Fancy  of not 
caring what happened to dogs they had bred, the Fancy  started purebred  rescue 
and taking back dogs when â??adoptionsâ??  failed.  Nevertheless, no  matter 
what 
the Fancy 
did, it was not  enough.  What the Fancy failed to  realize was that nothing 
it did, or  could ever do, short of stopping breeding  entirely, would make 
animal  rights extremists happy.  

In other words, whenever extremists  attacked them, the Fancy â??fought backâ?? 
 
by trying to become a kinder,  gentler AKC.  The more it gave on issues, the  
more its registration  numbers decline, while  registrations with the â??third 
worldâ??  registries have grown exponentially.  The AKC has already moved as   
far as it can afford to move. 

Two forces drive the AKC now, whether the  current board understands the  
fact or not.  One is the continual  public criticism of the AKC by animal  
rightsâ??
 extremists, and their  sycophants, who want to eliminate all  breeding.  
While this minority  is small, they are extremely successful at  framing 
issues, 
using isolated  examples to denigrate all breeders, and selling  their views 
to the  
masses.  They, also, take any incremental change in law,  or  philosophy, 
which furthers their extremist agenda.  The AKC is   apparently totally blind 
to 
how seriously this affects and effects them.   

The other driving force is declining registrations.  The AKC is,  no  doubt, 
growing increasingly desperate to reverse this trend.  It  has to  affect 
every decision that the Board of Directorsâ?? makes. Blaming  the  decline on 
bad 
publicity and so-called â??puppy millers,â?? who have moved  to other  
registries 
to avoid the AKC rules and regulations, is so  easy.  Both, no  doubt, 
negatively affected registrations.  For  instance, bad publicity  probably 
served to 
open 
some potential ownersâ??  minds to getting dogs registered  with other 
registries. 
Pandoraâ??s box, thus opened, provided ample  opportunity for puppy mill  
breeders sick of AKCâ??s new policies to go to other  registries and they  did. 
 

The AKC is just now awakening to these facts and, in a  desperate effort to  
right past wrongs and inaction, it is endorsing  PAWS.  The problem is that 
damage is already done.  Animal  rightsâ?? extremists defeated the AKC in  
â??round 
one.â??  The enactment of  PAWS will not â??revampâ?? AKCâ??s image like it  
hopes 
and it will not increase  registrations.  What it will do is give  round two 
to the extremists  by default.

The only way that AKC can effectively address the continued  decline in 
registrations is to abandon its useless attempts to garner the  approval of an 
extremist group.  Animal rights extremists will never,  under any  
circumstances, 
ever approve of what the AKC does, i.e., register  dogs.  The  AKC absolutely 
cannot afford to get this one wrong;  however, if PAWS is any  indication of 
what they have planned, the Fancy is  in very deep trouble.

PAWS will contribute to a further decline in  registrations.  What the  AKC 
fails to see is that:  The fewer  dogs registered with AKC, the more  dogs 
registered with the third-world  kennel clubs.  The more registered  with 
third-world kennel clubs, the  fewer ads there are with AKC dogs in  them.  The 
ads 
are how most  people learn about the AKC.  One is not  born knowing what A-K-C  
stands 
for.  Most people, even if they know someone  who shows  dogs, could not tell 
which registry was behind the shows if their  lives  depended on it.  If the 
AKC does not appear in ads, it will fade   still further from the publicâ??s 
awareness. Ultimately,  AKC will be a   sad echo of things past, the fond 
memory 
of old timers who like to share  stories  of the grand old days.    

The AKC is a dog  registry.  Any illusions it may have that it can  
â??recreateâ??
 itself in  the image of an organization like HSUS need to be  rethought.  
Nothing  would be a more fatal blow to AKC than such an  attempt.  Those groups 
 
are not registries.  They can and will thrive  whatever happens to the  AKC. 
Those organizations are parasites that profit from  continuous  negative 
assaults on the AKC, knowing it to be the â??flag shipâ?? of the   registry 
fleet.  If 
they 
take it down, they doom the Fancy but all  they  have to do is start 
attacking another registry.  

AKC is  at a pivotal point in its history.  When training dogs, if one  has a 
 problem, one â??returns to the basics,â?? and that is exactly what AKC needs   
to do. RETURN TO THE BASICS! 


Donna Malone
Vice President,   Responsible Animal Owners of Tennessee - a nonprofit 
organization  promoting  the humane treatment of animals and responsible animal 
ownership  - Because  Love is Not Enough! 


Ginger  Cleary, Rome, GA
"Those who desire to give up freedom in  order to gain security, will not 
have, nor do they deserve, either one."  Benjamin Franklin.
_http://www.rihadin.com_ (http://www.rihadin.com/) 

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Continental Kennel Club/PAWS