[ SHOWGSD-L ] California...animal bills we LIKE didn't make it...

  • From: "Peggy" <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <GSDCALegislative@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 09:07:59 -0400

Levine and Mancuso are celebrating............and pointing 
fingers...................    our side dropped the ball


Seven initiatives that would have limited the state's ability to regulate 
animal ownership have failed to qualify for the ballot due to a lack of 
signatures.

The measures were introduced in November by opponents of AB 1634, the 
mandatory spay/neuter bill from Assemblyman Lloyd Levine, D-Van Nuys. The 
Secretary of State reported on its website on May 2 that the proposals had 
not qualified.

Among the provisions of the various initiatives were clauses that would 
declare animals as property, prevent the state from limited the number of 
animals someone could own, ban putting microchips in animals, limit animal 
licensing fees, and prevent "coerced sterilization of humans or animals."

"We didn't get enough signatures," said Jill Holt of We the People Pets, the 
group behind the failed initiatives. "It was a grassroots effort, but with 
not enough money. We're going to re-file."

"I don't want to say 'I told you so,' but I have a pretty good idea when 
they started circulating they were probably miscalculating the voters 
feelings on the issue," Levine said. "I don't think there were many voters 
out there who wanted to do the things the initiatives would do."

Levine said that he's concentrating on talking to senators on the Local 
Government Committee, which is AB 1634's next stop. The bill passed the 
Assembly on a narrow 41-38 vote last June. It would require any dog or cat 
over six months old to be spayed or neutered, with exceptions for many 
breeders and working animals. Levine said not only would it save upwards of 
a million dogs and cats from being euthanized in shelters each year, but it 
could save state and local governments $300 million currently spent on 
warehousing these excess animals.

Holt and others said the bill awakened a grassroots resistance against what 
they see as government intrusion. AB 1634 was unquestionably one of the most 
watched bills of last year, generating thousands of letters, emails and 
phone calls to Capitol offices. She pledged her group would be back with 
more money and experience.

"It's a very interesting process," Holt said. "We'll be a lot better 
prepared next time."

The American Kennel Club, the American Dog Breeders Association and several 
other groups are still opposing the bill. But they did not materialize as 
funders of the initiatives, as some on the pro-AB 1634 side feared.

"I don't think they ever really had an organized campaign," said Judie 
Mancuso, coordinator for the pro-AB 1634 media campaign. "I think it was 
more to just get attention. It got their word out that they're against 
protecting animals in any size, shape or form."

In the meantime, she said, the bill is having national influence. 
Legislators in Arizona and Colorado are patterning bills based on it, as are 
several cities, including Chicago. Los Angeles passed a spay/neuter 
ordinance in March; mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signed it at a ceremony that 
including former "Price is Right" host Bob Barker, a well-known animal 
welfare activist.

Levine and Mancuso are celebrating, and pointing fingers...

Seven animal initiatives fail to qualify for ballot
By Malcolm Maclachlan (published Friday, May 16, 2008)

Seven initiatives that would have limited the state's ability to regulate 
animal ownership have failed to qualify for the ballot due to a lack of 
signatures.

The measures were introduced in November by opponents of AB 1634, the 
mandatory spay/neuter bill from Assemblyman Lloyd Levine, D-Van Nuys. The 
Secretary of State reported on its website on May 2 that the proposals had 
not qualified.

Among the provisions of the various initiatives were clauses that would 
declare animals as property, prevent the state from limited the number of 
animals someone could own, ban putting microchips in animals, limit animal 
licensing fees, and prevent "coerced sterilization of humans or animals."

"We didn't get enough signatures," said Jill Holt of We the People Pets, the 
group behind the failed initiatives. "It was a grassroots effort, but with 
not enough money. We're going to re-file."

"I don't want to say 'I told you so,' but I have a pretty good idea when 
they started circulating they were probably miscalculating the voters 
feelings on the issue," Levine said. "I don't think there were many voters 
out there who wanted to do the things the initiatives would do."

Levine said that he's concentrating on talking to senators on the Local 
Government Committee, which is AB 1634's next stop. The bill passed the 
Assembly on a narrow 41-38 vote last June. It would require any dog or cat 
over six months old to be spayed or neutered, with exceptions for many 
breeders and working animals. Levine said not only would it save upwards of 
a million dogs and cats from being euthanized in shelters each year, but it 
could save state and local governments $300 million currently spent on 
warehousing these excess animals.

Holt and others said the bill awakened a grassroots resistance against what 
they see as government intrusion. AB 1634 was unquestionably one of the most 
watched bills of last year, generating thousands of letters, emails and 
phone calls to Capitol offices. She pledged her group would be back with 
more money and experience.

"It's a very interesting process," Holt said. "We'll be a lot better 
prepared next time."

The American Kennel Club, the American Dog Breeders Association and several 
other groups are still opposing the bill. But they did not materialize as 
funders of the initiatives, as some on the pro-AB 1634 side feared.

"I don't think they ever really had an organized campaign," said Judie 
Mancuso, coordinator for the pro-AB 1634 media campaign. "I think it was 
more to just get attention. It got their word out that they're against 
protecting animals in any size, shape or form."

In the meantime, she said, the bill is having national influence. 
Legislators in Arizona and Colorado are patterning bills based on it, as are 
several cities, including Chicago. Los Angeles passed a spay/neuter 
ordinance in March; mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signed it at a ceremony that 
including former "Price is Right" host Bob Barker, a well-known animal 
welfare activist.












============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: