[ SHOWGSD-L ] Animal Rightists: Coming to a Town Near You
- From: "Ginger Cleary" <cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Showgsd-L@Freelists. Org" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:08:09 -0400
-----Original Message-----
http://magic-city-news.com/article_6472.shtml
Animal Rightists: Coming to a Town Near You - Are Your Council Members
Being Used as Pawns?
By Nick Van Duren
Aug 11, 2006, 21:03
A disturbing trend is sweeping America: Costly and destructive animal
ordinances. The reason stems from an all-out effort by Animal Rightist
organizations to lobby every single city in the U.S. They are searching out
lawmakers to exploit and further their twisted agenda.
A Full-Court Press
It’s hard to comprehend, but the leadership of the largest and most
profitable "non-profit" lobbying Animal Rights organizations has an
ambitious goal in mind: destroying all usage and ownership of domestic
animals. That includes, but is not limited to, abolishing pet ownership.
(See Animal Rightist Quotes Below)
Animal Rightists know full-well that they are not main-stream. However, they
’ve been successful in influencing the American lexicon with politically
correct words such as "over-population". With financial support from
Hollywood and an ill-informed public, they spread propaganda, and
inaccuracies about dog behavior. Their legislative packets are filled with
phony studies, quack testimony, faulty statistics, and other materials are
sent to city councils all over the country under the guise of being a
reputable source. The News Press has been all too happy to oblige,
publishing sensationalized stories which trump up the credibility of such a
nonsensical agenda.
What is missing from these News stories is that these groups do not care one
whit about animals, the welfare of animals, or the health and longevity of
animals. This is proved by the fact that animal rights groups such as PeTA,
claim to be helping elephants in Africa, but are simultaneously lobbying an
all-out assault to destroy cats, dogs, and the family pet at home. Do you
know the difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights?
Animal Welfare is concerned with health, safety, quality of life, and the
future of animals.
Animal Rights views domestic animal ownership as "slavery" and seeks to
destroy the domestic animal by whatever means necessary. The fastest and
most effective way to accomplish this agenda is by using lawmakers to pass
prohibitive animal laws, such as mandatory spay/neuter, or breed specific
ordinances (BSL).
The relationship between man and dog goes back literally tens of thousands
of years. Animal Rights seeks to destroy that
relationship...one-law-at-a-time. Just as wild animals are important to this
world, domestic animals and our pets are an integral part of our short time
on this Earth. There is nothing good about the Animal Rightist’s agenda to
eradicate the future of our beloved pets.
Once the ownership and the relationship we have to the domestic animal is
destroyed, it is quite obvious that they’ll move on to the next
power-seeking agenda. Just like a plague of locusts, they infect the
culture, exploit lawmakers to do their bidding, corrupt shelters and law
enforcement, manipulate the News Press, and profit off it at everyone’s
expense.
What makes these activists tick? First, they are collectivist in nature.
They obviously harbor a deep-seeded hatred for humanity. Yet, they should
not be underestimated in any way, shape, or form. They are well-organized,
well-connected and extremely well-funded.
Sphere of Influence
The pathology of this evil has many faces, which both the public and
lawmakers should be aware of. This is crucial to avoiding its sphere of
influence. No good can come of associating with these groups and
individuals. I can not stress enough how important it is to know who they
are and what they stand for...or what they’re capable of.
Some of these activists are hysterical, showing up to council meetings
wearing blood-soaked t-shirts, screaming and crying hysterically. They give
emotional testimonials and always seem to have a convenient supply of
shocking and horrible photos to share. They are militant, obsessed,
brain-washed activists, but are very motivated. They participate in protest
rallies and don’t mind getting arrested to prove a point. However, they
should be avoided as they are sometimes prone to violence.
Then there are the ones to really watch out for and be cautious of. These
are the cool and calculated activists. Some portray themselves as individual
civic leaders, and professionals such as Kory Nelson, Assistant DA of
Denver, known all over the country and Internet as Denver’s "Dr. Death of
Dogs". Then there is Wayne Pacelle of the Humane Society of the U.S. He is
polished, charismatic, and good-looking. He trained for his position at the
Humane Society of the U.S. as a member of PeTA.
They are educated and well-connected and have money to burn. They carry with
them titles of accomplishment and credibility, seducing their listeners by
being well-spoken and charismatic. They approach lawmakers from both
parties; the goal of infiltrating and corrupting the legal process from
every angle. While ALF and ELF blow up buildings, their PeTA counterparts
are busy screaming for attention. HSUS then comes in to consult under the
guise of legitimacy. Their websites and promotional materials are
phenomenally well-crafted. Their resources are unlimited. In fact, it is
likely that your municipality is already using their materials to guide
policy and craft new ordinances.
Once Animal Rightists are "outed", concerns are dismissed as "conspiracy
theories" and the like. They do this to shut down the debate. After all, who
could believe it?
However, one thing is for sure: Animal Rights is very conspiratorial in
nature. The agenda has been built into multi-million dollar enterprise
harboring well-paid Capital Hill lobbyists and lawyers in conjunction with
violent militants on the front line.
However, the shelf-life of these organizations is limited. They are not
main-stream by any stretch of the imagination. Therefore, they have only a
small window of opportunity. This partially explains why much of the
propaganda materials being delivered to municipal governments and lawmakers
have been authored under pseudonyms and other aliases. Phony studies,
pamphlets, and letters are often Animal Rightists parading propaganda
incognito.
A Powerful Lesson for Lawmakers
Few lawmakers would be willing to accept advice from People for the
"Ethical" Treatment of Animals, or from the Animal and Environmental
Liberation Fronts respectively for good reason. These groups happen to be
tracked on the FBI’s Domestic Terrorist Watch List for their violence and
damage to private and public property.
They promote a completely dishonest agenda under faulty premises. For
example, the origin of lobbying for mandatory spay/neuter laws comes from
PeTA’s "No Birth Nation" program; which, by the way, is not intended to end
with animals. No breeding or stricter laws regarding whelping of puppies
ends up aiding this systematic destruction of healthy pure bred pets. As
absurd as it sounds, consider how many municipalities are flirting with the
idea or have actually gone so far as to pass it. Others want registration
and intact animal fees. Every one of these ideas assists PeTA’s No Birth
Nation program and gives it legitimacy.
However...
No lawmaker would dare be associated with such groups and their agendas
providing their constituents were aware of the names behind the proposed
animal ordinances.
And yet, they do.
When all is said and done, lawmakers are being manipulated and used.
Animal Rightists have no problem exploiting lawmakers and municipalities for
their own aims, nor do they care if these lawmakers wind up embarrassed,
recalled, or ousted from politics.
Kory Nelson, Denver’s "Dr. Death of Dogs"
According to the News Press, you’d think dog attacks are an epidemic.
However, as a percentage of population, abuses, attacks, and cruelty are
very rare...especially by the poster child of Animal Rightists: the
so-called "Pit Bull". The deceitful information spread about this breed
reaches epic proportions.
For example, Kory Nelson, Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO joined the
Colorado Douglas County Republican Party, in which the GOP has traditionally
left pet ownership rights alone. Under his influence, the Town of Parker, CO
introduced Breed Specific Legislation (BSL). Council members were quoted in
the press, describing horror stories of Pit Bull behavior. They mistakenly
used verbatim descriptions straight from the Kory Nelson "handbook". Never
before had the Town witnessed such an outcry by residents.
After the facts were brought out, the Town Council unanimously voted to
remove the proposed ordinance. However, the damage was done. Nelson had
contributed a valuable service to the Animal Rightist’s ability to affect
the language of law and put our property rights on the defensive. It was all
done at the expense of honest, law abiding residents.
Did the outrage and embarrassment at the Town’s expense stop Nelson? No. He’
s moved on to other cities to pursue his Breed Specific Legislation. Kory
Nelson defends his war against the Pit Bull, claiming that anti-BSL forces
have some kind of financial interest in dog fighting. It is obvious that
Nelson lacks credibility and a personal moral code that is necessary to
continue as a prominent Assistant City Attorney of a major city. If he
actually believes that certain breeds of dogs are more cunning, more
powerful, more intelligent than any human being is capable of owning, how
can he possibly serve the best interests of the public good?
As Animal Rightist ideology does not mix with principles of individual
responsibility, morality, or responsible government, it came to a shock that
a conservative community had become a home base in which to spring his
platform. For whatever reason, the City of Denver, however, continues to
allow him to use his position as Assistant DA to promote his destructive
agenda.
If his campaign isn’t against the Chow Chow, it is the American
Staffordshire Terrier. If it isn’t the American Staffordshire Terrier, it is
the French Mastiff...and so on and so on. Destroying ownership of
one-breed-at-a-time is what Breed Specific Legislation is all about.
No one knows for certain whether Kory Nelson operates with animal rights
organizations, or acts as a lone wolf, so to speak. He is ambitious, having
successfully used and exploited several local governments around the U.S. to
achieve his Breed Specific Legislation trademark. Even if BSL fails, Animal
Rightist language often gains a foothold into the language of animal
ordinances. The criminalization of dogs and cats has begun. Regardless of
success or failure, he exploits one city and then moves on to adversely
impact animal owners in another.
If he hasn’t contact lawmakers in your area, it is only a matter of time.
Once contacted, you’ll need to decide whether you’ll allow yourself to be
used for his personal agenda and those of other Animal Rightists.
The Influence of Shelters on Animal Law
Considering the phenomenally successful statistics of voluntary spay/neuter
by the general public, where are all the animal shelters getting their dogs?
Regardless of the facts that most shelter dogs are adult dogs, sadly
displaced due to people moving to covenant-controlled homeowner associations
and cities with extreme pet limits, the numbers in shelters do not add up.
Obviously, shelters should be going out of business left and right since
voluntary spay/neuter is successful. Euthanization numbers have been
declining for 20 years. And yet, "over-population" is the mantra still used
by animal shelters for fund-raising and selling dogs to an ill-informed
public.
Where is the over-population when dogs and cats are transported across state
lines and from even out of the country to fill up animal shelters?
Even the numbers of irresponsible breeding are nothing like people think it
is. Considering the voluntary rate of spay/neuter, it is highly unlikely
that accidental and irresponsible breeding are filling up shelters to the
extent that shelters claim they are.
However, a product must come from somewhere. If your job is about to
disappear, often people do desperate things. Why should animal shelters be
any different; especially when one considers what is happing inside these
organizations. Some are so passionate that they’d do nearly anything to keep
the "moral imperative" of the shelter going. This partially explains why
"over-population" is used as a marketing ploy to sell dogs and cats. Tell a
family that the dog they’re interested in is about to be destroyed due to
"lack of space", the deal is closed. Another dog is then shipped in to take
its place as product.
City Councils and the general public should be aware that Animal Rightists
lobby with local Animal Shelters as cover. The cruelty and unethical
practices in the shelter industry are shocking...and make no mistake, it is
an industry. Many shelters have become some of the most profitable pet shops
around that kill anything that does not bring top dollar; or is too much
work to place in adoption programs. Pure Bred Rescue organizations have an
awful time getting pure bred dogs and cats out of the shelter system, simply
because shelters exploit these breeds to increase sales. Sadly, the News
Press and general public have been willing to look the other way.
Why do some shelters operate in this manner? The answer is that many shelter
agencies have become havens for Animal Rightists; shelters are exploited to
spread propaganda, "over-population" myths, and faulty statistics for
marketing purposes. Shelters naturally become a breeding ground for
recruiting new members and activists. It’s a natural, albeit unhealthy, fit.
It is no wonder dubious shelter operations are becoming an ever-increasing
problem. Thankfully, not all shelters are this way, but the public should be
aware of what is going on. Both Animal Control and many animal shelters have
had their ethics compromised, if not downright corrupted. The end-result is
that generally, shelter workers and animal control agencies are not a
credible source for accurate information about animal behavior and breeding
of quality pets, especially when it comes to crafting pet law.
Fancy That!
The Dog and Cat Fancy, and show-breeders alike, has been aware of shelter
abuses for many years. Fanciers operate their own rescue organizations and
our rules about breeding are very strict. What’s more, it’s a small world.
Fly-by-nights never last long. Unethical practices are not tolerated. You
would never see a Fancier cross-breeding a "mutt". Ethics are the
cornerstone of show-breeding; incredible knowledge and experience is
required, as is mentorship. The competition, the friendships, relationships,
and even politics and rivalries, all steer show-breeding towards the future
of healthy dogs of good conformation and temperament. You’re lucky to break
even financially in this sport. You do it for the love of the breed. My love
is the English Mastiff. Friends of mine show and breed Yorkshire Terriers,
Afghan Hounds, Staffordshire Terriers, Dalmatians, and the Irish Setter.
We spend thousands of dollars and untold hours of time and effort to test
our dogs for what is required for the future of our respective breeds. We
labor for the love of our dogs and cry when we must send them up to Heaven.
We build life-long friendships; spend untold hours of time putting on dog
shows, educating puppy-buyers, labor 24 hours a day every time we whelp a
litter of puppies, and work hard to learn, learn, learn. It’s an on-going
process in an incredible effort to further a tradition which spans
generations.
Rarely will you ever see our dogs wind up in an animal shelter. We govern
ourselves. The only problem with the Fancy is it is guilty of not reaching
out to the public and helping city councils as much as it could be...for
good reason:
We’re under attack. Licensing, pet taxes, registration schemes have done
incredible damage to healthy pet ownership over the years.
Animal Rightists know full well that destroying the Fancy is a major
victory. That is why animal ordinances and restrictive measures such as
licensing, registration, mandatory spay/neuter, etc. have forced the most
responsible and knowledgeable group of pet owners in the world nearly into
hiding. And it is the general public which misses out on the benefits of our
knowledge, and experience, and our passion for furthering the love of our
dogs.
Fanciers residing in cities are forced to keep a low profile or move to the
country. They simply stay active amongst themselves. The result is that the
general public does not get to tap into this invaluable resource for
educational opportunities. What has replaced it is a variety of quack
training methods, political correctness, and just plain ignorance spread by
opportunists and even some pet-related businesses.
We are really interested in the health and well-being of pets, and we are
just as interested in the future of our breeds. If a dog is healthy, of good
temperament, and has sound conformation, it should be bred. Future health
and genetics depend on it!
Education...and Lack Thereof
The vast majority of the public generally does not even understand something
as simple as how to approach a dog properly. First, it is polite and
expedient to ask the owner if you may pet a dog. Then you offer to have the
dog sniff your hand. When the dog conveys that, "It’s okay to pet me", you’
ve been given permission; but always pet from underneath the head. Never on
top of the head! No matter how friendly or unknown the dog is, this is the
cardinal rule before petting any dog, cat, etc...
Only do you pet the dog’s head after you’ve gone underneath and worked your
way around the neckline, back of the ears (which most dogs love!) and then
from behind, you may go over the top. Petting the head first is aggressive!
Nearly every single person that greets my dogs in public tries it;
approaching without manners...this lack of proper etiquette is simply a
result of ignorance. And yet this is something as remotely simple as saying:
"Hi!"
Despite the fact that ignorance can be fixed, municipalities are quick to
pass ordinances without considering the pet education element in their
communities.
If safety is what we’re after, than creating an open and active, pet
friendly community is what we should be striving for. Anything which
contributes to this should be done. Anything that hinders it should be
stricken from the books. Tapping into the Fancy and encouraging them to be
active is the fastest way to build allies rather than enemies. Rather,
further regulating pets and pet breeding into oblivion will contribute to
animosity, an unsafe community, and unhealthy pet population faster than
anything.
Municipal Animal Abuses and Cruelty
Animal Rightist propaganda would have us believe that animal abuses and
cruelty are at epidemic levels, not to mention that attacks most certainly
receive sensational press coverage. The Press is only too happy to oblige
any political opportunism by politicians, animal control, shelter agencies,
and municipal employees actively pursuing their own agendas. Animal Rightist
ordinances have become a means to an end, exploited at the expense of the
general public.
However, as a percentage of population, dog attacks, dog fighting, and even
cruelty and nuisance behavior is rare. As disturbing as these incidents are,
they are not even close to being the rule...they are by far the exception.
Therefore, utilizing the exception to the rule as an opportunity to enact
intrusive and unethical animal ordinances is distasteful and extremely
dishonest. Witness the results:
Denver has over 1,000 kills to its credit in only the last year. Many of
these dogs perfectly healthy before being confiscated, starved into ill
health, and then killed.
Kansas City has concocted a process that it terms an "amnesty program". It
goal is to make the slaughter of these innocent pets more convenient and
less costly for animal control to enforce.
Long Beach forces residents to spay/neuter their pets, placing dogs
(especially certain breeds) at physical risk by mandating surgery. We wouldn
’t tolerate a municipality strapping down and sterilizing our children? Why
should animal control be allowed to do this to our pets? Our private
property? One begins to wonder.
Animal Control in Vermont has been going door-to-door conducting sting
operations on average people; all to enforce a licensing pet tax.
Under the influence of Animal Rightists, some council members have even gone
so far as to introduce legislation that governs everything down to what kind
of food, containment, and even toys, are legal and illegal for our pets.
And that is just the beginning of the scandal, opportunism, abuses of search
and seizure, etc. The list goes on and on. Overbearing animal ordinances
almost always lead to these types of abuses, especially when shelter and
animal groups are given government enforcement powers. When will these local
governments admit fault and stop these destructive practices? Communities
become less active and open, Fanciers become less willing to help the
public, ignorance and lack of socialization becomes the norm.
That is exactly what Animal Rightists are banking on.
When Animal Rightists write ordinances that sic Animal Control on breeders
via licensing, pet-limits, and registration schemes, the very future of
healthy well-tempered pets is compromised. No breeding. No pure-bred
animals. No healthy genetic stock. Hence, no more pets. No cats. No dogs. No
nothing!
The only way to prevent these horrors from taking root in your community is
not to go there in the first place. Again, only an open and active
pet-friendly community creates a fun and safe place to live with our pets
and neighbors.
The Ends Justify the Means
These abuses are the sure result of the Animal Rightists campaign to wage
death and destruction on our beloved pets. Again, the "ends justify the
means".
What exactly is the end? Power. The ensuing corruption contained within the
intent to influence animal ordinances aids activists in the accumulation of
wielding more power. Using and exploiting lawmakers wherever they deem
necessary, the Animal Rightist goal of achieving power and wealth at public
expense is in full force.
Even where lawmakers pursue their own agendas, where animal ordinances are
concerned, the lawmaker is still a pawn of these lobbyists.
Fighting Animal Rightist Ideology and Helping City Councils Reform Municipal
Agendas, The Moral of the Story
The lesson to be learned is that by the time Animal Rightists have taken
municipalities hostage and animal ordinances pass, no one knows what has hit
them. Animal ordinances quickly compromise the ethics of Animal Control
agencies. These ruthless and irresponsible policies are most certainly not
something that should have been introduced into law; let alone, considered,
passed, and enforced.
Unfortunately, reinstating honesty into the debate is not as easy as it
sounds. Egos are so entrenched to the point where lawmakers are hesitant to
admit fault. They know they’ve been used, but backtracking becomes
difficult; if now downright political suicide. While this does not absolve
lawmakers of responsibility, it does partially explain the successes of HSUS
and others to control City Councils and municipal governments.
As the Dog and Cat Fancy (show-breeders) and animal welfare groups continue
to mobilize and gain influence, the general public is indeed becoming aware
of what is going on. The public is aghast at how their pets are being held
hostage by such political exploitation. And the fury is spreading at a rapid
pace. Animal Rightist ideology is incompatible with public safety and
private property ownership. Therefore, lawmakers and the ordinances they
pass are being tracked. When re-educating lawmakers fails, they are being
voted out and replaced.
The fight has only scratched the surface. With so many pet owners and dog
fanciers in the U.S. becoming aware of the fact that animal ordinances truly
do pose a very real danger to pet ownership, it is likely that elections are
going to become very interesting in the near future. Those who vote for
intrusive animal ordinances will lose clout, influence, and promptly voted
out. Those who keep hands off and ally themselves with the Fancy to promote
activities and community education will be rewarded.
As pet owners continue to mobilize, the political landscape will most likely
change drastically in many areas in the country. This is actually a positive
development because it is a healthy democratic process that aims at
preventing constitutional infringements and other assaults on our freedoms.
Ultimately, we love our pets. We love our choices. It is a healthy
tradition. Anything that puts pet ownership in jeopardy is incompatible with
moral principles.
It all comes down to one thing:
Will your lawmakers and your city government aid and abet this destructive
agenda?
Nick Van Duren
Colorado Director, Responsible Dog Owners of the Western States
Local Liaison for the Colorado Federation of Dog Clubs
Contact Nick: checknick@xxxxxxxxxxx
If Anyone Doubts how Serious Things Have Become, Please Read the Following
Quotes by the Leaders and Activists within the Animal Rightists Movement:
"Anybody who shoots a pit bull running loose is justified,'' Kory Nelson,
Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO, San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, June
27, 2005 (Known all over as Denver’s "Dr. Death of Dogs")
"We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock
produced through selective breeding. . . One generation and out. We have no
problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human
selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US,
formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May,
1993
NOTE: (Wayne Pacelle’s initial training was as a PeTA activist. Today he
heads HSUS under the guise of "legitimacy". It is the largest and most
profitable of the animal Rightist lobbying organizations.
"Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human
manipulation." Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PeTA), Just Like Us? Harper's, August 1988, p. 50.
"As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are
like slaves, even if well-kept slaves." PeTA's Statement on Companion
Animals.
"We are not especially 'interested in' animals. Neither of us had ever been
inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are.
We didn't 'love' animals." Peter Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for
Our Treatment of Animals, 2nd ed. (New York Review of Books, 1990), Preface,
p. ii.
"Our goal: to convince people to rescue and adopt instead of buying or
selling animals, to disavow the language and concept of animal ownership."
Eliot Katz, President In Defense of Animals, In Defense of Animals website,
2001
"It is time we demand an end to the misguided and abusive concept of animal
ownership. The first step on this long, but just, road would be ending the
concept of pet ownership." Elliot Katz, President "In Defense of Animals,"
Spring 1997
"The cat, like the dog, must disappear... We should cut the domestic cat
free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until
our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist." John Bryant, Fettered
Kingdoms: An Examination of A Changing Ethic (Washington, DC: People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA), 1982, p. 15.
"My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin, employed
at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur
Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in
1996.
"Man is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish, and unethical animal on
earth." Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President,
Humane Society of the United States, as quoted in Robert James Bidinotto"
"We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both
economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but
the power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property
until we win." Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights
Gathering 2005. The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005.
"Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are 'acceptable crimes'
when used for the animal cause." Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA
"Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and
get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works." Ingrid Newkirk, PeTA's
founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002
"I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring
economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and
giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for
animals, good for human health and good for the environment. Ingrid Newkirk,
PeTA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001
---------------------------------------
Ginger Cleary, Rome, GA
Proud member GSDCA and Sawnee Mtn Kennel Club
www.rihadin.com
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2006. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - URL temporarily deleted due to AOL issues
============================================================================
Other related posts:
- » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Animal Rightists: Coming to a Town Near You
