[sac-forum] Re: Cherry Road 9/11/10

  • From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:31:53 -0700

Jimmy, guess you've finally figured out I'm on the dark side.  I needed a 
finder chart for Archinal 1 and got it from the Digitized Sky Survey.  Just 
having the coordinates weren't enough.  As for Palomar - they have already been 
on the list.  Palomar 8 in 2006 and Palomar 5 in 2007.

In addition to the 3 above, Ru 135 wasn't very easy either as was NGC7839.  Oh 
well, sometimes we need a nice challenge but without the cloudy skies.

Glad you enjoyed the comets.  They were on my list but I had to cancel 
observing plans at last minute.

AJ Crayon
Phoenix, AZ

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jimmy Ray 
  To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:53 PM
  Subject: [sac-forum] Re: Cherry Road 9/11/10


  It appears that AJ has gone over to the "Dark Side" and seems to be bent on 
picking "evil" objects such as Archinal 1. I'm fairly convinced we'll start 
seeing "Palomar" objects on the list next J. I will admit at it did keep me 
occupied for the entire 70 minutes of clear sky we had last night. I should 
submit a "call for observations" Archinal 1 -  70 minutes of nothing!

   

  I did enjoy observing Comets 103P / Hartley and 10P /Temple.

   

  Thank you,

   

  Jimmy Ray

   

  From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Richard Harshaw
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:19 PM
  To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [sac-forum] Cherry Road 9/11/10

   

  Last night, Steve and Rosie Dodder, Paul Lind, Darrell Spencer, Jimmy Ray and 
I spent the night at Cherry Road. It was a mixed bag.

   

  As the sun drew near the horizon, fingers of high, wispy clouds kept rolling 
by with tempting pieces of sky as blue as the pants of a Dutchman.  After 
sunset, this pattern continued, with seeing about as bad as it gets in Arizona 
and transparency ranging from 0 to 7, depending on what part of the sky you 
were working in.

   

  From about 8:00 pm to 1:00 am, we kept up a lively game of "chase the holes" 
and had overall decent results, the seeing settling down to about a 5 or 6 out 
of 10 and transparency hitting maybe 8 in some pockets. (Jimmy spent most of 
his night trying to find Archinal 1.).  We knocked off about 1:00 am and all 
hit the sack as the sky was getting pretty crummy by then.

   

  Paul Lind suggested that these high clouds were forming and dissolving in 
place, not blowing in from the south, and I tend to agree with that. If you 
look at the weather data last night, there was high humidity way aloft and if 
the air temperature at 30,000 feet or so was within a degree or two of the dew 
point, clouds could form pretty fast as the moisture condensed and radiated its 
heat of vaporization into the night sky, and then clear out if a wave of warmer 
air blew by.

   

  About 2:00 am I got up to check the sky and found it mostly clear and 
crystalline. I woke up the team and by time most were out and ready to go 
again, the cat-and-mouse cloud game returned.  All but Darrell and I stayed 
up-we ran until 4:00 am, chasing holes in a surprisingly good NE sky-and bagged 
quite a few elusive targets.

   

  For an astronomy night, it was a dismal event. But for the friendship, jokes, 
and good fellowship, it was a 10 all the way around!

   

   

   

  Richard Harshaw

  Cave Creek, Arizona

  Brilliant Sky Observatory

   

Other related posts: