[sac-board] Re: Amendment on the constitution....
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:38:56 -0700
Since we have not gotten to this point yet, who knows who or how many
will be upset by this waiver business. Are you going to threaten the
person with revocation of his or her membership? That's a pretty
hallow threat. Can't even cancel their membership card as this is
none. All you will do is have less membership money and support.
I doubt I will be going to any SAC star parties that require a waiver
and if it required to renew my membership this will probably be my
last year with SAC.
Jeff
JeffAt 14:05 -0700 8/23/05, Tom Polakis wrote:
>Jeff Hopkins wrote:
>
>> Do you honestly think deferring to the constitution would make a
>> difference if someone did not want to sign a waiver? That is a big
>> problem with this whole effort. You have no means of enforcing it. At
>> best it will cause ill feelings...
>
>Ill feelings? With whom? I haven't given it much thought, but I
>can only think of one star party attendee, SAC or otherwise, who
>would have ill feelings about signing such a waiver.
>
>Tom
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
7812 West Clayton Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
www.hposoft.com
Other related posts:
