Re: initial support for multiple "executables" in a single unikernel

  • From: Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx>
  • To: rumpkernel-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:48:57 +0000

On 16/06/15 10:06, Justin Cormack wrote:

This seems an ideal case for a standalone "knead" utility that takes a
bunch of programs and outputs something that can then be baked, no
need for it to be part of baking... It can then be (im)proved as a
standalone tool.

For what benefit?

rofl @ "(im)proved"

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rumpkernel-users
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2015