Re: Kernel Development Tutorial

  • From: Robert Gifford <robertgif@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx>, rumpkernel-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 18:29:43 -0500

Thanks for the quick response! I'll check it out and I'll let you know if I 
have any other questions. 

Robert


Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx> 
Date:02/26/2015  6:18 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: robertgif@xxxxxxxxx, rumpkernel-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Cc:  
Subject: Re: Kernel Development Tutorial 

On 26/02/15 21:56, Robert Gifford wrote:
> Good Evening
>
> I had a question concerning the Kernel Development tutorial on the
> rumpkernel wiki. I was curious as to why the tutorial has you download both
> rumprun_posix and buildrump.sh as two separate directories? If
> rumprun_posix comes with its own buildrump.sh, why can't I just use that
> buildrump to edit my kernel driver source code?

Robert,

Good question, but my answer is better: I don't remember.

There are 3 possible explanations:

1) I wasn't thinking when I wrote that tutorial.  For such a glaring 
thing, it's unlikely I wasn't thinking *that* much (though possible).
2) The way buildrump.sh *was* run from rumprun-posix was not compatible 
with carrying out the tutorial
3) The way buildrump.sh *is* run from rumprun-posix is not compatible 
with carrying out the tutorial

If you think that a separate buildrump.sh is not necessary -- and I'm 
not saying you are wrong -- the best thing is to try it out.  The worst 
that can happen is that you have to rm -rf the repo and start from scratch.

If you can complete the tutorial, you can edit the wiki page and remove 
the separate buildrump.sh bit.  If not, you can edit the wiki and add a 
short explanation of why you need both.  Everyone wins ;)

   - antti

Other related posts: