Begin forwarded message: > From: "Change.org" <mail@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Serving our four-legged veterans > Date: March 29, 2014 at 12:52:20 PM EDT > To: elizabethard@xxxxxxxxxxx > Reply-To: "Change.org" <mail@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Elizabeth - There's a new petition taking off on Change.org, and we think you > might be interested in signing it: > > > > > Too Cute To Be Equipment, Too Brave To Go Down Without A Fight! > > By Lisa Phillips > Converse, Texas > > > > Sign Lisa's Petition > > > > Follow the bill on Facebook > at:https://www.facebook.com/MilitaryWorkingDogReclassification > > Currently Military Working Dogs (MWDs) are still referred to as equipment. > When the military doesn’t need them any more they are considered excess > equipment and the military no longer has responsibility for them. They are > usually retired for medical reasons. Medical bills for our retired MWDs can > be astronomically high. > > During the 112th Congress, North Carolina Congressman Walter Jones (R) > introduced the House version of The Canine Members of the Armed Forces Act on > 28 February 2012 and Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal (D) introduced > the Senate version of The Canine Members of the Armed Forces Act on 27 > February 2012. > > This bill had bi-partisan support, bicameral support and support north & > south of the Mason/Dixon Line. The Canine Members of the Armed Forces Act > uses no tax-payer money. It does not take away from human Veterans' care. > > Parts of the Canine Members of the Armed Forces Act were amended into and > passed in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. > > Six United States Senators sent a letter to Leon Panetta, Secretary of > Defense urging him to take advantage of the statutory authority they gave him > to transport Military Working Dogs to a suitable location for adoption. They > encourage him to implement the statutory change allowing him to provide > guidance to improve the quality and lower the costs of veterinary care in a > manner that allows for nonprofit organizations to execute this provision. > They suggest that he provide a letter of commendation to each MWD that > identifies the MWD's meritorious service and provide additional recognition > as appropriate. All as allowed thanks to the amendment to the NDAA. While not > in the NDAA they encourage Secretary Panetta to reexamine the current > classification of MWDs as equipment and reclassify them as canine members of > the Armed Forces. > > Michael B. Donley, Secretary of the Air Force replied to the Senators’ > letter. Regarding transportation he indicates that many adopters pay > transportation costs. He acknowledges the veterinary care portion. He > indicated that he provides letters of commendation to retiring MWDs as > warranted. He indicated that MWDs are not referred to or treated as > equipment, but did not offer to change the Air Force Manual to reflect that. > > On 3 October 2013 we received a copy of a Bullet Background Paper on Military > Working Dogs Classified as Equipment. PURPOSE: “Provide information on AF > Classification of military working dogs (MWD) as equipment. SUMMARY: > “Wording contained in AFMAN 31-219 referring to MWDs as equipment is > misleading compared to the level of respect military personnel have for their > K-9 partners and care given to them. This verbiage is outdated and is being > rewritten. This new, updated publication will indicate the true level of > appreciation and respect the USAF has for these valuable members of our USAF > team.” > > Our current goal is to remind the Air Force that we watching for the updated > manual. > > > Sign Lisa's Petition > > > > The person (or organization) who started this petition is not affiliated with > Change.org.Change.org did not create this petition and is not responsible for > the petition content. > > This email was sent by Change.org to elizabethard@xxxxxxxxxxx. You can edit > your email preferences or unsubscribe from Change.org emails. > > Start a petition on Change.org > > Mailing Address: 216 West 104th Street, Suite #130 · New York, NY 10025 · USA > > > > Elizabeth Ard elizabethard@xxxxxx