[rollei_list] Re: Why Rollei T?
- From: Nick Roberts <nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:16:18 +0100 (BST)
The T stands for "Terrific", I think :)
Personally, I prefer the 3.5F, or even the 2.8F - but
the T is a very, very capable machine. When I'm
travelling, I often find space for a T with a few
filters, a couple of Rolleinars and the Panoram head -
it's a very versatile machine for the weight.
Nick
--- Jan Decher <Jan.Decher@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bob:
>
> Why a Rollei T and not a 3.5F? Do you prefer the
> characteristics of
> the 3.5 Tessar over the Xenotar/Planar for
> portraits?
> I also noticed in A. Evans' book that the T is much
> lighter (36 oz)
> than the 3.5 F(44 oz), has only Bay I filter mount
> and (type 3) is 220
> capable.
> Great features. I will start looking for one.
> Jan
>
> On Tuesday, March 29, 2005, at 02:02 AM, FreeLists
> Mailing List Manager
> wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:39:44 -0500
> > From: Bob Shell <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Using only one camera would be like eating the
> same thing for all three
> > meals seven days a week. I have a Rollei T and
> 6008i in medium format.
> > In 35mm I have a Rollei QZ35T.
>
>
>
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
