Richard. "Softness"? Hell NO!! Every Apo-Lanthar I have ever seen or used was painfully sharp. I never took one apart or researched it as you do, so I never knew the configuration. Jerry Richard Knoppow wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marvin Wallace" <Marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 4:15 PM > Subject: [rollei_list] VoigtlanderApo Lanthar > > Does any one have experience with the legendry Voigtlander > Apo Lanthar? > Does any one know why they reach such high prices. > > Regards, > Marvin. > P.S. SMILE PHOTOGRAPHY IS FUN! > > I don't have an Apo-Lanthar so can't answer this as asked. > However, FWIW, the Apo-Lanthar is a Heliar type lens > reportedly using Lanthanum glass in one or more element. > This is probably true, Lanthanum glass is used in a great > many lenses designed after WW-2. Rare earth glass allows > getting combinations of high average index with lower > dispersion than is available in conventional glass. This has > an advantage in many designs of being able to reduce all > aberrations. > There is an earlier Voigtlander lens called the Lanthar, > this is a Cooke Triplet type. > The Heliar is capable of excellent performance. The Kodak > Ektar used on the Medalist camera and also available as a > 105mm, f/3.7 lens, and the shorter FL Kodak Enlarging > Ektars, are all Heliar type lenses, albeit designed > according to a patent by George Aklin, which uses the > additional surfaces to improve marginal correction. > I think the high price of the Apo-Lanthar is partly due > to its being a sort of cult lens and probably also because > relatively few were built. Heliars can have some odd off > axis softness and are popular as portrait lenses because of > it. This may also be true of the Apo Lanthar. In general, > the Plasmat type is a better choice for LF work. It is the > basis of most current LF lenses, like the Schneider Symmar, > and of most current high quality enlarging lenses. > The Heliar type was used by Voigtlander, who originated > it, by Dallmeyer as the Pentac, and the above Kodak lenses, > but was not widely exploited by the industry in general. > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list