On Saturday, April 30, 2005, at 07:19 PM, Marc James Small wrote: > At 06:52 PM 4/30/05 -0400, Ardeshir Mehta wrote: > >> I wonder why the tooling for the F models was lost. If it holds quite >> a value, as you wrote, wouldn't it have been saved? >> >> Also, if the new GX and FX Rolleis are made with T-model tooling, are >> they inferior in tolerances compared to the F models? (Given the fact >> that the T was the "cheapie" model, I mean?) > > This was a BANKRUPTCY. Rollei had no voice in the matter: the > authorities came and took the tooling off for the benefit of the > creditors, who seem to have sold it to be melted down for its metal > value. But then, why would they not have done that with the tooling for the T-model as well? > The tolerances on the T were identical to the tolerances on the E and > F models. The only difference was in the features offered and not in > the quality of the camera: a Rolleiflex T is a REALLY high-quality > camera and you ought to buy one to see this in person. Yes, I should, indeed. I have hears so much about it, and all good! Cheers. --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list