[rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollei problem
- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:55:52 -0400
Carlos -
I have Rolleis with factory baffles, such as my 2.8 C and Tele. And I
have my 'Cord III which I flocked. The difference is obvious. I
suggest you try the test described by Richard Knoppow in a previous
post...
Eric Goldstein
--
On 8/25/08, Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric, they are not the best after 50 years or more from the camera
> manufacture, anyway I'm lucky with my 'cord IV, it does not have noticeable
> internal reflection problems, the baffles work fine.-
>
> Carlos
>
>
> --- El lun 25-ago-08, Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
> > De: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Asunto: [rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollie problem
> > Para: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fecha: lunes, 25 de agosto de 2008, 10:31 pm
>
> > I did this a million years ago. I think I got it here:
> >
> > http://www.fpi-protostar.com/flock.htm
> >
> > I agree that the Rollei baffles are not the best...
> >
> >
> > Eric Goldstein
> >
> >
> > On 8/25/08, Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric
> > Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:42 PM
> > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Strange Rollie problem
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > An even greater bargain is the 'Cord III.
> > Same ergonomics and nice
> > > > aperture. I flocked mine with ultraflat camera
> > velvet... seemingly
> > > > superior to the factory baffles on later cameras,
> > which would make
> > > > this treatment impossible...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eric Goldstein
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Where did you obtain this stuff? I can think of
> > several applications
> > > for it.
> > > BTW, I've found that the edges of the baffles
> > can reflect a surprizing
> > > amount of light. Try shining a small flashlight into
> > the lens while looking
> > > at the back (with the shutter open of course). I have
> > no doubt flocking or
> > > velvet could do better.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Richard Knoppow
> > > Los Angeles, CA, USA
> > > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging
> > into www.freelists.org
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
> Yahoo! Cocina
> Recetas prácticas y comida saludable
> http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
