[rollei_list] Re: Sharpness and Old Tessars

  • From: Peter J Nebergall <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:02:42 -0500

I have piles and piles of work fone with an old uncoated Leitz Elmar.... 
a tessar type, and it is, if anything, sharper than the Biotars, the
Primoplans, and, sadly, some of the Xenons.  I measure a lens by whether
it "takes off" for me, does good work in my hand, and sometimes a bit of
flare (Biotar) bakes a great portrait.  BTW, I have a # of Biotars in
different mount (I have Contax D's, among other things, ) and they are
spectacularly different from each other.

My favorite old glass, per "what it can do for me"?  The old uncoated
collapsible f2 Sonnar for Contax II.  a third of my show-gallery stuff is
off that combination.
and the coated f1.5 sonnar?  As good as my Nikons.  Customers think so
too.

Ruddy, here in Columbia there is a j-school, and the kiddies are full of
attitude, to the degree it severely restricts their ability to do a good
job with their cameras.  I use the old stuff, and take fiendish delight
in getting in their beardless faces with it -- and whipping their butts. 
Like I say in STREET PHOTOG, its how you play it.  An old one pointed in
the right direction at the right time beats the tar out of the latest
digital scheisskamera -- that isn't.

best to all

PJ Nebergall

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:03:54 -0400 Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:
> Ruddy Roye wrote:
> 
> > Why do I hear so many photogs run away from tessar lens
> 
> 
> Umm, ignorance? Stupidity? The desire to have large pieces of glass 
> to 
> compensate for their small... brains? ;-)
> 
> I really can't say I've run into all that much prejudice against 
> Tessars. The large format f/9 Nikkors are Tessar-types and they have 
> a 
> killer rep. In terms of pix, just about everything shot on Speed 
> Graphics over the years have been shot with Tessar-type lenses.
> 
> Generally, modern photographers look for lens speed more than 
> anything 
> else, and that may have a great deal to do with such an ill-informed 
> 
> prejudice. At f/8, you would be hard pressed to see the difference 
> between a good MF Tessar and just about any other MF lens...
> 
> 
> 
> Eric Goldstein
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into 
> www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 
> 

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: