Petr, No, completely different. R'softs are scribed circular lines. Softars are little bubbles in a plastic disc. Jerry Petr Dvorak wrote: > How do Rolleisofts compare to CZ Softars? Are they similar filters > sold under different brands? > > Petr Dvorak > On 11/26/06, Eric Goldstein < egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Richard - > > I've always found them pretty much useless, much too heavy > handed as > you say. My solution is to shoot lenses that have un- or > under-corrected spherical wide open, as the classic portrait > lenses > have. In the past, I've had pretty good luck in MF shooting > fast > triplets like the Zeiss Triotar found on the old > Rolleicords. I also > have a Welta 66 folder with a 75/2.9 Meyers Trioplan which > is really > nice for this application. > > Eric Goldstein > > -- > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.0.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.16/551 - Release Date: > 11/25/2006 > >