This is an interesting story. It raises the question of right to privacy vs freedom of expression. As a street photographer, I am biased in how I view it, but it would be interesting to learn what others think. I know that my opinion of Henry Cartier-Bresson fell some when I learned he didn't like to be photographed. If you live by the Diane Arbus creed that if you appear in public there is a likelihood you will be photographed, something is wrong when you object to others taking your photo. This will be an interesting topic, I hope. Doug ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:19:09 -0800 >An interesting article about stree photography appeared in >the N.Y.Times for March 19th. > ><http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/19/arts/design/19phot.html?_r=1&oref=slogin> > > >--- >Richard Knoppow >Los Angeles, CA, USA >dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >--- >Rollei List > >- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' >in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > >- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with >'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > >- Online, searchable archives are available at >//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > ________________________________________________________________ --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list