[roc-chat] Re: [roc-chat] Re: Punisher Flight Data

From: R Dierking <applerocketry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:45:49 +0000

The clear distinction in the altitudes makes it nice to draw some conclusions.
There were not too many variables really. Of course it would have been better
to only change the mass or have tailcone/no tailcone, but still nice.

From now on, I’ll always include a tailcone on my rockets that aren’t min
diameter and check the sim for that optimum weight.

Also, check the nozzle before the flight and not assume that it’s good because
it’s a commercial engine. Just still not sure about the rail button location
thing.

A would like to hear what Chris has to say about the information he collected.

From: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎June‎ ‎19‎, ‎2015 ‎8‎:‎53‎ ‎PM
To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mine were AGL

Gregg Halligan

In a message dated 6/19/2015 7:43:40 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
davew6dps@xxxxxxxxx writes:

Chris,

Are those altitudes AGL or MSL?

On Jun 19, 2015 7:47 AM, "Chris J Kobel" <Chris.J.Kobel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Here's my final data collection:

Orange - scratched
Pink - CATO (3/9)

6 successfully recovered flights - average altitude=14877' (though none of the
six rockets registered in the 14s!)
Bi-modal distribution of limited data

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- [roc-chat] Re: Punisher Flight Data
  - From: Chris J Kobel

[roc-chat] Re: [roc-chat] Re: Punisher Flight Data

Other related posts: