Mix consistency problems (pun intended) are why they developed multi part processes using a single rounded cup with a rounded mix stick and then improved them again by replacing cups and sticks all together with multipart mixing tips. A lot has changed / improved since they "vetted" the composite processes and materials for the B2. For one thing better materials and multipart mixing tips are now available over the counter. A master builder will always be able to do miracles with a blob of this, mixed with a blob of that, based upon experience and skill. If you are not a master builder, train under one, listen to one, and or take advantage of newer process technologies designed to take the "magic" out of achieving reliable & repeatable results. "The tools to those who can use them" The best part of the discussion for a newbie has been the "magic" of priming and after coating filled adhesives! That part of the "magic" typically will not change no matter how you do your multipart mixing! I don't recommend relying on any joint you can't visually inspect in a hobby environment! P.S. I personally do not fly anything "BIG" > multi "D" at the Lake because I am there with kids and kid built rockets. I want them to safely learn from their mistakes and or lack of attention to detail. So for the big stuff take my comments with a grain of salt knowing that they are not hobby related. I am always drawn to the simplest way to do things. Less hassle mixing means more time and attention spent on priming and over coating the joint to maximize reliability. Best Regards, Tom Hanan President & CTO Model-T-UAV Tom.Hanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any accompanying data or files is confidential and may contain privileged information intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution, and or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at the email address above, delete this email from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege. From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Maschek Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 6:46 PM To: ROC-Chat Subject: [roc-chat] Re: best way to .... Ditto on the double cup use. I once had an area on a fin that never set up because of unmixed. A B-2 worker told me about double cupping and never had the problem again. Rick _____ Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:54:20 -0800 From: kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [roc-chat] Re: best way to .... Clarification on the clarification on the..... well you know I didn't mean to say you weigh out each component in a separate cup and then mix them (bad idea), double cup equals, Weigh all the parts into the first cup, weigh part a, tare the scale part b, tare, part C, etc mix all the components in the first cup, THEN transfer ALL of the mixed adhesive to the second cup, throw away the mixing stick and with a new mixing stick mix it some more. Here is the reason, when you mix, even if you scrape the container REALLY well, the bottom corners are usually not mixed well. By pouring it into the second cup you keep this unmixed adhesive out of the part. When you need that last little bit of adhesive out of the cup is when the problem shows up, scraping the bottom of the mix cup sometimes some of the unmixed stuff can come out. I did a FMEA (failure analysis) on an aerospace part that failed. A critical failure was linked back to improper mix (BTW, they put the test coupons together first then bonded the part), when we looked at the retain in the cup, two things became apparent, there was almost no resin in the retain cup, and the adhesive in the cup didn't cure properly due to incomplete mix. The adhesive was hard but not fully cured. The test coupons tested out fine so one one suspected there was a problem until a part failed during fist article testing. This was a REALLY expensive failure. Just my professional opinion. At the day job I always insist on ether double cup or static mixer on a mix gun. Mike Kramer On 11/20/2011 1:13 PM, Tom Hanan wrote: Single cup mixing is the fastest, easiest and most accurate especially when adding additional parts to the cup using an included syringe or plunger applicator. Pour the first part into the cup, while still on the scale add and mix whatever weights, of the 2nd, 3rd or 4th parts of fillers, stabilizers and or catalysts needed to achieve the best ratios for the specific application. Simply follow the manufacturer's instructions on the order and or timing of the multiple parts need to be added. The technique is so fast, simple and accurate that we rarely have the problems typical with multi cup mix ups. Pun intended! Hope this helps. P.S. We store the 2nd, 3rd and 4th parts in the applicators between mix-ups w/o any problem since there is minimal exposure to air. Since we are running well below Mach we tend to favor joint flexibility and durability over rigidity. Tom Hanan President & CTO Model-T-UAV Tom.Hanan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any accompanying data or files is confidential and may contain privileged information intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution, and or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at the email address above, delete this email from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege. From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim - TFJ Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 9:34 AM To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: 'Gregory Lyzenga' Subject: [roc-chat] Re: best way to .... Just some points of clarification on West System & DP-460 The West System epoxies do not come with fillers added, the DP-460 does. There's a great cost disparity between the 3M DP products and bulk epoxies like West and others. West System (and others) have numerous additivies to alter the characteristics of the base resin. They include adhesive fillers like the high density (404) or colloidal silica (406) to fairing filler (407) and microlight (410). Like I said before, if a rocket can go subteranean and fly again (at least the fin can section was flyable), then it must be pretty good stuff. Here's a selection chart on the fillers. http://www.westsystem.com/ss/filler-selection-guide/ I use the adhesive filler for stuff like centering rings, and the fairing filler for fins other areas. If you only bought one though, I'd go with the fairing filler because it's much easier to sand. The 406 is brutal to try and sand. Jim G. _____ From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike & Nancy Kramer Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 8:17 AM To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Gregory Lyzenga Subject: [roc-chat] Re: best way to .... Not smart enough not to weigh in on this one, Laminating resins like west or proset are really not designed to be adhesives but are designed to laminate. The viscosity of West system is about 1,000 cPs (centipoise), as compared to 20,000 cPs for 3M DP-460 or 70,000 cPs for DP-190G. Peel strength is another measure of how tough a adhesive is. Just comparing West System has a "T-Peel" of around 5 lb-in, DP -460 has a T-Peel of greater then 60 lb-in. It is a VERY tough adhesive, plus the higher viscosity will keep it in place during bonding. JB weld has high shear strength but isn't the toughest stuff. Adding fillers like cabosil or micro balloons, helps the viscosity but doesn't help the peel strength a lot. On JB weld, it is great stuff for the right application. Bonding a retainer on a motor mount, great application need high temp capability, high shear strength, relatively high viscosity, not worried about peel. For fin fillets, not as concerned about temperature, needs high viscosity, high peel strength, not as worried about shear strength (fins fail in peel not shear), a better candidate would be DP-460. MUCH tougher, will keep the fin on during a hit that would snap it off with JB weld or west mixed with silica. Couple of other comments, Mix, always weigh (or use duo pac) if it is a critical joint. harbor freight sells small scales really cheep. 1 to 1 by volume doesn't equal 1 to 1 for weight on all systems. Double Cup, weigh in one cup, mix the adhesive, then pour (scrape) all of it into another cup, using a new mixing stick mix it again, don't use any of the 'leftovers' in the first cup. Smart and final sells 'french fry boats' the cardboard boats that resturants serves fries in, works great as a place to mix resin. A sleeve of them last a LONG time, coffee stir sticks from S&F are good for mixing and rally cheep. Temperature - Time - Adhesives. Hard doesn't equal strong. Most room temperature adhesives need a long time to get to full strength (think days at room temp, weeks at 50 degrees F), heating them to even 120 F for a few hours significantly speeds things up. Surface prep, wipe - sand - wipe. Wipe them with solvent then sand, then wipe again. Careful some cleaners leave a residue. I use Acetone or MEK. Bond to PVC - DP-460 will give 500 lb shear strength when bonding to PVC MUCH higher than most adhesives. Mike Kramer On 11/19/2011 10:51 PM, Gregory Lyzenga wrote: On Nov 19, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Mike Ostby wrote: Thanks Greg. Sounds like beefing up the couplers is in order. So how is that best done? To be honest, since after that experience, I've sort of sworn off cardboard couplers. I tend to use phenolic most often. But when I do use cardboard, I stiffen it by laminating it on the inside with fiberglass or carbon/kevlar cloth, using an inflated balloon inside the coupler to compress it. - Greg