[retroforth] Re: Further thoughts on blocks
- From: Charles Childers <charles.childers@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: retroforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:47:47 -0500
> Keep the code of rf clean. Better use the current way of
> including blocks (or a 'load') and then a store of the current
> Forth environment.
This isn't as easy as it sounds. You'd likely have to modify the
startup routines a bit, and if you're going to save a memory image,
you might also want to dump the startup code since that's compiled.
Other related posts:
