[real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines/ life prinsaples.
- From: "jose" <crunch1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:46:41 -0600
I have a wonderful passter. coach as we call him, has some amazing wisdum.
he is in his 80's or late 70's.
he has a list of life prinsaples.
I will be getting all of them from him soon.
one of them is the assumsion prinsaples.
I will not assume what another person will say, do, or think.
coach says there not prinsaples he came up with. I truly don't care who came
up with them, I just care that he knows them and is willing to shair them
with me and his class.
hugs.
will not make d disessions based on feelings, secuasions,
Jose Lopez, President
Lopez Language Services, LLC
"We Speak Your Language"
Call us anytime at 888.824.3022
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mitchell D. Lynn" <mlynn@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:39 PM
Subject: [real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines
> Good lord? Where did I say that? I said they might have wanted an idea of
> how large the dog is so they could provide sufficient room for him/her. If
> they said you couldn't take the dog, then that would be a violation. But,
> and this is important, they did not deny you your dog. No right was
> violated.
>
> This is clearly troubling to you. And based on this, I would encourage you
> to contact American Airlines customer service dept and ask some carefully
> thought out questions. You have, after all, been a long-time and satisfied
> customer of theirs. Don't they deserve the benefit of the doubt? Is it
> possible, that there are perfectly acceptable and reasonable explanations
> for their follow-up questions?
>
> I would suggest writing those questions out as close to verbatim as you
> can,
> and then reread them yourself without intonation. Better still, get
> someone
> to read them to you. Is it the questions themselves that are the problem,
> or
> the way in which they were delivered, or is it that they were asked this
> time and not previously? Give American the chance to explain themselves
> before convicting them.
>
> Every day, we make all sorts of assumptions, and often we never know if we
> were or were not right in our assessment of a situation. Usually, because
> it
> is something unimportant, but often simply because we don't follow-up. But
> there are also those times when we just don't look to see what other
> explanations there might be. It's like the mystery novels you have read
> where you are sure you know the villain. Come to find out, you were wrong
> only because you had looked at the whole thing the wrong way around.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: real-eyes-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:real-eyes-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Erika Wolf
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:11 PM
> To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines
>
> The dog should be taken off the airplane, even though she's a mobility
> tool?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: real-eyes-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:real-eyes-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Loy
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:05 PM
> To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines
>
> Weight is a very relevant issue. I have been on a plane before that was
> overloaded and they had to take some things off the plane before it could
> leave.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mitchell D. Lynn" <mlynn@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:44 PM
> Subject: [real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines
>
>
> Now that I have thought about the weight issue, it is probably irrelevant.
> I
> doubt any of those planes get close to max weight, but there is more to it
> than just weight per person. There are aerodynamic limitations (physics
> laws) that determine max weight capacity.
>
> There are weight issues now for baggage as well. Or so I am told. Anyone
> here confirm that?
>
> May have been a space issue in any case; merely trying to provide
> sufficient
> accommodation for the dog.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: real-eyes-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:real-eyes-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Scott Dollar
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:32 PM
> To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines
>
> Hi Erika,
>
> I want to make it a litttle clear about the weight issues on airplane.
> The
> weight issues are for human/person only. There is no weight issues for a
> guide dog and service dog that has exemption from transportation. My
> suggestion to contact the DOT asap to make sure that there is no rules for
> guide dog and service dog for weight issues.
>
> Scott
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options,
> go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options,
> go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options,
> go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options,
> go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options,
> go to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go to
www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
Other related posts:
- » [real-eyes] Re: illegal questioning by american airlines/ life prinsaples. - jose
