Tom:
In general I like it. We could run a lot of trains on just a little space.
I do wonder why there are so many little panels as opposed to using a total of
three panels?
I also thought that we were going to make the layout such that we could have a
two panel layout in some situations and three panels when we had a larger
space. The present design doesn't seem to allow this flexibility. I am not
militating for this approach, but simply wonder what happened to that idea.
Lastly, would we use electrically controlled switches or use manual ones?
Having at least some of the switches electrically controlled would permit some
active selection of tracks without a lot of fuss.
Thanks for considering these issues.
Jack
________________________________
From: rc3r-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <rc3r-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Thomas
Gilsdorf <tlg225ccr94@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2018 11:06:35 PM
To: rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rc3r] Small Layout
I've been working on a new track plan for the small layout. It will entail four
new modules (2) 3x4, (1) 3x5, (1) 5x5. Attached is a copy of the revised
layout. We will be using FasTrack. Bob Buehler is looking at a large lot of
used FasTrack at an auction.
Feedback?
Thomas Gilsdorf
tlg225ccr94@xxxxxxxxxxx
